Скачать или смотреть Handling Concurrency in Go: Locking Resources During Goroutine Execution

Discover how to effectively `lock resources` in Go during goroutine execution to prevent multiple simultaneous processes.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64476784/ asked by the user 'Mully' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11925428/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64481945/ provided by the user 'Mully' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11925428/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Temporary lock the resource until goroutine is finished

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Handling Concurrency in Go: Locking Resources During Goroutine Execution

In the world of concurrent programming, especially when dealing with Go’s goroutines, managing access to shared resources is a crucial aspect that developers must overcome. One common scenario arises when a goroutine is performing a long-running task which could conflict with other requests. For example, you may want to send an HTTP status code 202 Accepted to indicate that a task is being processed while simultaneously ensuring that no other requests trigger the same task until the first one is complete. This brings us to the problem of how to temporarily lock a resource until the goroutine has finished its execution.

The Problem

Let's say you have a method that performs some asynchronous task using a goroutine, like this simple example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this case, you are immediately returning a 202 Accepted status, indicating that the request can be processed, while the goroutine sleeps for 2 seconds. However, if the same request is sent multiple times, it may result in multiple goroutines being executed simultaneously, which can lead to undesirable results.

The Solution: Implementing a Lock with Mutex

To address this issue, we can use a locking mechanism to ensure that once a request starts the asynchronous task, any subsequent requests must wait until the previous task is complete. Although the initial approach with channels looks promising, it may not be the best way to achieve our goal, especially if you are unfamiliar with Go channels. Instead, using a mutex is a more effective way to handle this situation.

Here’s a revised version of the initial code which implements a mutex:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breakdown of the Code:

Mutex Initialization: A structure is created to hold a boolean flag v that indicates whether the resource is available and a pointer to a sync.Mutex to provide mutual exclusion when accessing resources.

Checking Resource Availability: Before starting the goroutine, the handler checks if the resource is available. If eventsLocker.v is false, it responds with an HTTP status 423 Locked indicating that the request cannot be fulfilled at the moment.

Processing the Request: If the resource is available, the handler sends a 202 Accepted status and initiates a goroutine to perform the task.

Locking and Unlocking: The goroutine first locks the mutex, sets the availability flag to false, and after completing the task (after the sleep delay), it unlocks the mutex and resets the availability flag to true.

Why Use a Mutex?

Using a mutex provides a more robust and straightforward approach to locking resources in Go's concurrent environment. A mutex ensures that only one goroutine can access the resource at any time, while channels can sometimes add unnecessary complexity to such scenarios, especially when the operations are simple locking and unlocking.

Conclusion

Effective resource management is key to success in concurrency. By leveraging a mutex, you can ensure that ongoing operations are managed efficiently and prevent unwanted simultaneous executions of a goroutine. This approach not only simplifies your code but also maintains clarity and reliability in your applications. If you encounter similar concurrency challenges in your Go programming, consider using mutexes as a reliable locking mechanism.

So next time you're dealing with goroutines, remember the importance of resource locking and how it can greatly simplify your code and enhance the robustness of your applications.