Скачать или смотреть How to Find Entity by Exact Matching in Spring Data JPA

Discover how to effectively search for entities in Spring Data JPA using exact matching methods, ensuring precise results in your queries.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62488165/ asked by the user 'Denis Stephanov' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6456586/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62664681/ provided by the user 'Eklavya' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4207306/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Find entity by exact matching in collection

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Find Entity by Exact Matching in Spring Data JPA

When working with databases, one often encounters the challenge of retrieving specific records based on certain criteria. This is especially true in applications that utilize Spring Data JPA, where entities represent tables in the database.

One common scenario involves finding conversation entities based on user IDs. However, the typical approach using an IN clause can yield unexpected results, as it may return records that match on any of the given IDs, instead of requiring an exact match. In this guide, we’ll walk through how to implement an exact match search for user IDs within conversation entities.

The Problem: Non-Exact Matches

To provide context, consider the following example of conversation entities represented as follows:

iduser_ids1user-a, user-b, user-c2user-a, user-b3user-a, user-cIf you want to find conversations that include exactly user-a and user-c, a standard JPQL query using the IN clause would look like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, this would return conversations with IDs 1 and 3, as both include user-a and user-c. The desired outcome is to retrieve only conversation ID 3, where the match is exact.

The Solution: Use HAVING with CASE

To achieve this precise filtering directly from the database, we can utilize HAVING combined with a CASE statement. This method allows us to count matches of the user IDs and constrains the results to only those conversations that have an exact match of the count of user IDs. Here’s how to implement it:

Step-by-Step Implementation

Modify the Repository Method: Define a custom query within your Spring Data JPA repository that uses the HAVING clause.

Use Parameters: Pass in both the list of user IDs you’re searching for and the expected count of those IDs.

Here’s how the code looks:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Query

LEFT JOIN c.usersIds cu: This joins the users IDs with conversations to enable us to filter them.

GROUP BY c: Groups the results by conversation, allowing us to apply aggregate functions.

HAVING SUM(CASE ...): This checks if the count of matched user IDs equals the number of user IDs being searched. If this count matches, it implies an exact match.

:userIdsCount: This is passed as a parameter and corresponds to the size of the list of user IDs being used for the search.

How to Call the Method

To call this method, ensure that you pass the user IDs you want to find and the count of those IDs:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By leveraging the HAVING clause with a CASE statement, you can efficiently find entities in Spring Data JPA that match your criteria precisely. This approach ensures that you avoid common pitfalls associated with the IN clause, leading to cleaner and more accurate queries.

Now, when you need to perform such searches in your applications, you have a reliable mechanism to retrieve only those conversations that have an exact match of user IDs.

Feel free to experiment with this technique in your own applications. Happy coding!