Скачать или смотреть Infiray Jerry CE5 Coti vs Infiray ML19 thermal monocular comparison

Modern debate, should I use coti clip-on thermal or set up a helmet mounted thermal combo?

COTI - version we have here is working only with battery pack. We get 6 working hours with two 18650 batteries. Resolution 640x512. Quite 'calm' for your eye and brain. With battery back quite bulky setup. Weight 78g added at front of your NV (mono/bino/pano) Can't use without night vision or during day. Price over 4000€ + your night vision device which is mandatory.

Product - https://www.falconclaw.eu/.../infiray...

ML19 - Works with one CR123 battery for approx 1 hour. With 16650 battery cap extender we get 4 hours of work and USB-c port supports standard battery banks (7000 mph battery bank can get us 8+ hours) Resolution 384x288. Digital display. Different palettes (black/white/red hot). Electronic magnification x1-4. Electronic compass. Unfortunately no inner recorder. Weight 225g. Can be used also during day, hand-held or with helmet-mountable minirail type of mounts/bridges (supports minirail-dovetail adapters). Not firearm recoil compatible. Price 2150€

Product - https://www.falconclaw.eu/product/ml-...

For longer work, to brain, Coti feels calmer . Also with Coti we can 'increase or keep' night vision field of view. On the other hand ML19 thermal gives in our opinion faster surrounding awarness. Wearing it as helmet mounted thermal, first time might be unfamiliar, brain just couldn't decide which picture to work with, but it's trainable. We recommend white phosphor, because it feels more natural with white display.

Any questions? Lets have a chat in comments, Facebook or email [email protected].