Скачать или смотреть How to Clone an Object in Kotlin Without Using Data Classes

Discover how to efficiently clone an object in Kotlin, ensuring that operations return the correct derived type without using data classes.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71196094/ asked by the user 'Dims' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/258483/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/71196322/ provided by the user 'broot' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/448875/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to clone object in Kotlin (not data class)

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Clone an Object in Kotlin Without Using Data Classes

In the realm of object-oriented programming, one common task is cloning or duplicating objects. However, when working with derived classes in Kotlin, especially without relying on data classes, this can become a bit tricky. This guide aims to clarify how to clone an object in Kotlin while ensuring that the derived type is returned when performing operations specific to that type.

The Problem: Cloning in Kotlin

Suppose we have a base class, Matrix, which is intended for operations like matrix addition. When we perform operations on instances of Matrix or its derived classes (like EnhancedMatrix), we want to ensure that the result is of the same derived type. This is crucial for methods that might behave differently depending on whether they are working with a base or derived class.

Consider the following example of a Matrix class and an EnhancedMatrix class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The main question is: How can we achieve this cloning functionality without knowing the derived class at compile time?

The Solution: Utilizing a Factory Method

One elegant solution to this problem is to implement a factory method within the base class itself. Here’s how it works:

Create a Base Class with a Factory Parameter: Modify the Matrix class to accept a factory method that knows how to create instances of the derived type.

Implement the Derived Class Accordingly: The derived class, in this case, EnhancedMatrix, can then provide the specific factory method. Here’s the refined code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this setup, when you perform a multiplication operation (using the times operator), it will automatically use the factory method to create an instance of the derived class, thus upholding the integrity of the type.

Self-Referencing Generic Types for Compile-Time Resolution

If you want to ensure that the result’s type is correctly resolved at compile time (i.e., you want c to be recognized as EnhancedMatrix), you can implement a more complex solution using self-referencing generic types. This ensures type safety and enhances code clarity. Here’s how you can set it up:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this implementation, the Matrix class is parameterized with its own type. This means when you call the times method on an instance of EnhancedMatrix, it will return an instance of EnhancedMatrix, achieving both the cloning functionality and ensuring the type is correctly identified at compile time.

Conclusion

Cloning objects in Kotlin, specifically in the context of a base class and its derivatives, may seem complex, but by utilizing factory methods and generics, Kotlin allows for elegant and efficient solutions. Remember, while the self-referencing generic approach is powerful, it can be intricate and should be utilized when truly necessary.

Always consider extending readability and maintainability in your code as well. Happy coding!