TikTok Sues the US | Can They Stop the Ban? (VL782)

Bytedance Ltd and Tiktok Inc are suing the US government over its enactment of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a law designed to require Bytedance to sell the Tiktok social media platform ostensibly due to its Chinese communist party ties. But is the first amendment actually being violated? And what's a bill of attainder, anyway?

Let's talk about it...in Virtual Legality.

Conversation with David Grace on Prototopics: https://t.co/rhvTMShyYq

KEY POINTS

- The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversaries Controlled Applications Act, enacted by Congress to potentially ban TikTok, is being challenged by TikTok and its parent company ByteDance for being unconstitutional, discriminatory, and not narrowly tailored to address national security concerns.

- TikTok argues that the act infringes on its First Amendment rights by singling out TikTok and ByteDance specifically without evidence of wrongdoing, while offering other companies a process to avoid the ban, and also failing to consider less restrictive alternatives.

- The lawsuit also contends that the act is a bill of attainder because it targets specific entities, TikTok and ByteDance, without a trial, and violates equal protection by treating them differently from other companies.

CHAPTERS
0:00 Introduction, Remembering Community Member Shareen
7:06 TikTok's Legal Arguments
20:17 Analysis of the Ban's Implications: First Amendment, Freedom of Expression, and the Bill of Attainder Clause
32:54 Examination of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act
41:48 Future Outlook: Changing Political Landscape and Potential Legislative Actions Against TikTok
51:08 Breakdown of TikTok's Ownership and Funding, and Legal Battles with President Trump's executive order
1:01:06 TikTok's First Amendment Rights in its Editorial and Publishing Activities and Legal Challenge Against the Act
1:14:26 Discussion on the National Security Agreement with TikTok and Government's Failure to Provide Alternatives
1:20:18 TikTok's Request for a Declaratory Judgment that the Act is Unconstitutional and Audience's Comments
1:27:35 Community Questions: Personal Experience with TikTok, Opinion on China's Ban, and U.S Government's Stance
1:29:33 Closing Remarks and Remembering Community Member Shareen

***
SUPPORTING THE CHANNEL

UTREON/PLAYEUR - https://playeur.com/c/aT-zMZf4XVIxwix...
PATREON -   / virtuallegality  
STORE - https://virtuallegalityshop.myshopify...

***
PLEASE SEE PODCAST NOTES FOR SOURCE LINKS FROM THIS EPISODE AT https://vl.hoeglaw.com/.

***
"Virtual Legality" is a continuing series discussing the law, video games, software, and everything digital, hosted by Richard Hoeg, of the Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (Hoeg Law).

CHECK OUT THE REST OF VIRTUAL LEGALITY HERE:
   • Virtual Legality  

DISCUSSION IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. INDIVIDUALS INTERESTED IN THE LEGAL TOPICS DISCUSSED IN THIS VIDEO SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN COUNSEL.

PODCAST PAGE (with AI chat links)
https://vl.hoeglaw.com/