Learn how to effectively list all `.txt` files in GitHub Actions, including top-level files, and understand why certain wildcard extensions may not work as expected.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63610969/ asked by the user 'thisIsTheFoxe' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9506784/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63648848/ provided by the user 'thisIsTheFoxe' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9506784/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: */ doesn't include files at top level
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to List All .txt Files in GitHub Actions While Including Top Level Files
If you’re working with a directory structure that contains multiple .txt files in nested folders as well as at the top level, you might face an issue while trying to list these files using GitHub Actions. In this guide, we’ll discuss the problem related to the wildcard usage in different shells and how you can effectively list all .txt files, including those located at the top level.
Understanding the Problem
Let’s start by examining the scenario where you have a directory structure like this:
a.txt
x/
b.txt
y/
c.txt
yz/
d.txt
You might initially try using the command:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This command works beautifully in Zsh, as it includes all .txt files regardless of their level within the folder structure. However, when using this command within a GitHub Actions environment, which defaults to Bash, you’ll notice that it ignores the a.txt file located at the top level.
Why the Issue Occurs
The problem arises due to the differences in how shell environments handle the wildcard patterns. Here’s the breakdown:
Zsh Shell: It supports the ** wildcard, which allows searching for files recursively, including the top-level files.
Bash Shell: Unfortunately, by default, Bash does not behave the same way; it won’t consider files at the root level when using the */ wildcard extension, resulting in missing files like a.txt in your case.
A Simple Solution
Fortunately, there is a simple workaround to this issue. Instead of relying solely on the **/*.txt wildcard, you can combine a couple of wildcard patterns to ensure you include all .txt files at both the top level and in subdirectories. Here’s how you can do it:
Step-by-step Command
Replace your original command with this:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Explanation:
*.txt: This will include any .txt files present in the top-level directory (e.g., a.txt).
**/*.txt: This will ensure that all .txt files in nested directories, such as b.txt, c.txt, and d.txt, are included.
Example Usage
Here’s a complete example of how you might write your loop in a GitHub Action step:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This command loop will now accurately display the names of all the .txt files, ensuring you don’t miss out on any files in your project.
Conclusion
When working with GitHub Actions, it's essential to be aware of the differences among shells regarding wildcard expansion. By using a combination of wildcard patterns, you can easily list all .txt files in your project, including those at the top level. This simple solution guarantees that you have complete access to all necessary files, ensuring your automation processes work smoothly.
With this understanding, you can now confidently tackle similar issues in the future. Happy coding!
Информация по комментариям в разработке