Скачать или смотреть Resolving the ValueError("Pool not running") in Python Multiprocessing with Function Returns

Learn how to fix the `ValueError: Pool not running` error in Python's multiprocessing when using functions that return values in parallel processing loops.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/59232822/ asked by the user 'Zack0ne' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12498846/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63096272/ provided by the user 'Moot' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1265409/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Python multiprocessing Pool 'raise ValueError("Pool not running") ValueError: Pool not running' function with return value

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Troubleshooting the ValueError("Pool not running") in Python Multiprocessing

When working with Python's multiprocessing library, you may encounter issues when trying to run parallel functions that return values. One common error is the dreaded ValueError("Pool not running"), particularly when you're running a loop that utilizes a multiprocessing pool to execute functions.

In this guide, we'll explore the root cause of this error and present several effective solutions to keep your code running smoothly.

Understanding the Problem

In your code, you are attempting to execute a function in parallel using a pool of worker threads. The problem arises when you try to reuse the same pool across multiple iterations in a loop:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Initially, this code may run smoothly during the first pass. However, after calling pool.close(), the pool cannot be used again. On subsequent iterations, Python raises the ValueError: Pool not running.

What's Happening When the Error Occurs?

First Iteration: The pool executes the tasks and you gather results as expected.

Subsequent Iterations: Attempting to use the closed pool leads to the error, since the pool's resources are no longer available.

Solutions to Avoid the Error

Solution 1: Reinstantiate the Pool on Each Iteration

One straightforward way to resolve this issue is to create a new pool for each iteration of the loop. For example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By creating a fresh pool for each loop cycle, the error is mitigated. However, this method can be inefficient as you are repeatedly recreating the pool.

Solution 2: Use a Context Manager for the Pool

A more elegant and Pythonic solution is to utilize a context manager, which automatically handles the setup and teardown of resources. Here’s how you can implement this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of Using a Context Manager

Cleaner Code: It reduces boilerplate code related to pool management.

Automatic Cleanup: The context manager ensures that the pool closes properly after use, even if an error occurs.

Conclusion

In summary, the ValueError("Pool not running") occurs in Python when you attempt to reuse a closed pool. By either creating a new pool for each iteration or using a context manager, you can run your multiprocessing code without this error.

Whether you're running simple calculations or more complex data processing tasks, understanding and properly managing your multiprocessing resources is key to effective and efficient Python programming.

By adopting one of the solutions provided in this post, you can focus on enhancing your algorithms rather than troubleshooting annoying errors. Happy coding!