Скачать или смотреть Why the "Bible Corruption" Claim Logically Fails (Part 2)

A common claim frequently heard in the Islamic world is that the current Bible has been changed, altered, and corrupted over time. But does this argument actually hold up to scrutiny?

Following our historical investigation in Part 1, this video examines the "Bible Corruption" claim through the lens of strict logic and comparative evidence. We face a critical issue known as the "Islamic Dilemma": If the Bible was corrupted, did it happen before or after the time of Muhammad? Both options lead to severe logical and historical contradictions for the Islamic worldview.

We also step beyond the Bible to examine the textual history of the Quran itself. Are the claims of its perfect, unchanged preservation factually accurate? By looking at known variants like the Hafs and Warsh texts, we demonstrate that textual variation is not unique to the Bible.

Join us as we use facts, logic, and history to show why the accusation that the Bible’s essential message has been lost is fundamentally flawed.

🔍 In this video (Part 2), we cover:
• The inescapable "Islamic Dilemma" regarding Bible corruption.
• Examining variants within the Quran: Hafs vs. Warsh editions.
• Why historical manuscripts refute claims of post-Muhammad alteration.
• The difference between textual variants and a corrupted message.
• The unbroken thread of redemption running through the entire Bible.

Disclaimer: Video and dubbing created with the help of Google NotebookLM, but research and script based on my own investigation.