Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

  • Quimbee
  • 2021-06-03
  • 611
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
  • ok logo

Скачать Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States | 973 F. Supp. 2d 591 (2013)

In Bell Atlantic Corporation versus Twombly and Ashcroft versus Iqbal, the United States Supreme Court held that a plaintiff must allege nonconclusory facts that, taken as true, state a claim for relief that’s plausible on its face. In the 2013 case Lockheed Martin Corporation versus United States, the District of Maryland addressed whether the plausibility-pleading standard enunciated by the Supreme Court in Twombly and Iqbal applies to affirmative defenses.

Lockheed Martin Corporation sued the United States, seeking to recover income taxes Lockheed had allegedly overpaid. Via affirmative defense, the United States asserted that if Lockheed overpaid on its taxes, the amount of that overpayment should be reduced based on any additional tax liabilities that Lockheed owed.

Lockheed moved to strike the affirmative defense, arguing that it stated an implausible legal conclusion. The United States opposed the motion, arguing that affirmative defenses don’t need to satisfy the plausibility-pleading standard.

The issue before the court was whether affirmative defenses must satisfy the plausibility-pleading standard enunciated in Twombly and Iqbal.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/lockhee...

The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/lockhee...

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o...
Facebook ►   / quimbeedotcom  
Twitter ►   / quimbeedotcom  
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]