Скачать или смотреть Understanding Why the Output is 0 in C+ + Logical Expressions

This guide explains the logic behind the output of a specific C+ + expression, addressing common misconceptions about operators and assignments.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64739869/ asked by the user 'Evangeline L.' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14600783/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64739993/ provided by the user '463035818_is_not_an_ai' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4117728/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why is the output 0 (=false)?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why the Output is 0 in C+ + Logical Expressions

C+ + is a powerful programming language known for its flexibility and control over low-level operations. However, with great power comes great responsibility—and sometimes confusion. If you're diving into the world of operators, you might encounter unexpected outcomes like the one discussed in this guide. A user posed a question about a specific piece of code and was left puzzled by its output. Let's break down the problem and clarify the solution step-by-step.

The Problem at Hand

The question revolves around this line of code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The user expected the output to be 1 (true) but was surprised to find it was 0 (false). Let's dissect this code to understand why it produces such output.

Breaking Down the Expression

The expression contains a logical operation that might appear straightforward at first glance, but it requires a careful examination of the components involved. We will analyze the expression piece by piece.

Step 1: Understanding Logical Operators

This expression employs two crucial elements:

&& (logical AND)

|| (logical OR)

! (logical NOT)

Step 2: Evaluating Each Component

Left Side of the OR (||) Operator: !(z < y && x < z)

First, evaluate the conditions:

z < y translates to 33 < 43, which is true.

x < z translates to 21 < 33, which is also true.

Thus, the combination true && true results in true.

Applying the NOT operator, !(true) results in false.

Right Side of the OR: !(x = z - y)

Here, we encounter an assignment operation: x = z - y, which calculates as follows:

z - y equals 33 - 43, giving -10.

The assignment x = -10 does change the value of x, but the key here is the value of the expression itself. In C+ + , assignments return the value that was assigned (in this case, -10).

Applying the NOT operator: !(-10) results in false since -10 is not equal to 0.

Step 3: Putting It All Together

Now we can combine our evaluations back into the main expression:

Combining Left and Right Sides:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The entire expression evaluates to false, which is represented as 0 in C+ + . This is the reason the output is 0 instead of the expected 1.

Conclusion

The confusion arose from misunderstanding how the assignment operator works in C+ + and how it interacts with logical operators. It is crucial to keep in mind the distinction between logical values and assignment values when evaluating expressions.

Remember:

Logical Expressions: Evaluate conditions to true or false.

Assignment: Changes the value of a variable and returns that value, which can affect logical evaluations.

This minor oversight led to a complete misinterpretation of the code's functionality. Learning to break down the components will help clarify similar situations in the future.

By understanding these nuances in C+ + , you can avoid common pitfalls and become more adept at writing and evaluating your code!