Скачать или смотреть How to Successfully Pass refcursor Between Procedures in PostgreSQL

Learn how to effectively manage `refcursor` outputs between stored procedures in PostgreSQL with a clear, step-by-step guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66605816/ asked by the user 'Mano' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5944884/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66607622/ provided by the user 'Mano' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5944884/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Postgres pass refcursor output of a procedure to another procedure

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Successfully Pass refcursor Between Procedures in PostgreSQL

When working with stored procedures in PostgreSQL, developers often encounter challenges when trying to pass refcursor outputs from one procedure to another. This can lead to frustrating error messages and wasted time in debugging. In this guide, we'll dive into a specific problem: how to successfully pass a refcursor from one stored procedure, T1, to another, T_main, and how to solve the common issues that arise during this process.

The Problem

In our scenario, we have a stored procedure named T1 that returns a refcursor. Here’s the structure of T1:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Now, we want another stored procedure, T_main, to call T1 and use its refcursor output. Here's an initial attempt at the structure for T_main:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, when executing T_main, we encounter the error: "cursor 'rc' does not exist." This is a common issue faced when the cursor from the called procedure is not being properly linked to the main procedure's cursor.

The Solution

To resolve this issue, we need to utilize the same refcursor parameter in the main procedure (T_main) when calling the dependent procedure (T1). Instead of declaring a new refcursor variable (rc_in), we can directly pass the existing rc parameter to T1. Below is the corrected version of T_main:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Fix

Single Cursor Variable: By directly passing rc to T1, we avoid creating any additional refcursor variables. This way, T1 operates on the same cursor that T_main eventually returns.

Improved Code Clarity: This method simplifies the code structure and reduces potential confusion about variable scope and existence.

Benefits of the Solution

Less Complexity: With fewer variables, the code remains cleaner and easier to read.

Direct Manipulation: You can directly manipulate the cursor that needs to be returned, improving efficiency in the procedure's operation.

Easier Error Handling: With a single refcursor, any issues arising with cursor management are easier to diagnose and fix.

Conclusion

Passing refcursor outputs between stored procedures in PostgreSQL can initially seem complex. However, by following best practices and leveraging the same cursor parameter, you can efficiently manage and utilize your cursors. The use of the correct procedure structure not only cleans up your code but also enhances its functionality. By adopting these techniques, you'll be better equipped to handle similar challenges in your database development tasks.

Feel free to experiment with the modified T_main procedure and see how it works seamlessly with T1!

Happy coding!