Скачать или смотреть R. KELLY VS TYRANN SMITH (2005)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ROBERT KELLY pMa “R. KELLY,”
Plaintiff,
against
TYR4N SMITH a/k/a “TY TY”, SHAWN
CARTER pMa “JAY-Z” and MARCY
PROJECTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
Defendants.

Plaintiff Robert Kelly pMa “R. Kelly” (“R. Kelly”), b! hi attorneys, Manatt, Phelp &
Phillips, LLP, as and for his Complaint against Defendants Tyran “Ty Ty” Smith (“Smith”),
Shawn Carter pMa “Jay-Z” and Marcy Projects Productions, hc. (together with Shawn Carter,
“Jay-Z”), alleges the following:
Nature of the Action
1. This action arises from an incident that took place on the evening of October 29,
2004, when Defendant Tyran “Ty Ty” Smith, an employee of rap star Jay-Z, viciously attacked
rhythm and blues megastar R. Kelly with pepper spray during R. Kelly and Jay-Z’s sold-out
concert at Madison Square Garden on a tour the artists were co-headlining. Smith was acting
within the scope and course of his employment by Jay-Z and undertook the attack on R. Kelly to
whether Jay-Z’s business interests in the tour.
2. As a result of this attack, R. Kelly was rushed to the hospital for treatment and
could not finish his performance. After the attack, rather than terminate Smith’s employment or
denounce his conduct, Jay-Z ratified Smith’s actions. lay-Z failed to dismiss or reprimand Smith
for his conduct despite the fact that Smith was charged with third-degree assault by the New
York District Attorney’s Office for his outrageous behavior. Instead, Jay-Z forced the tour’s



Join this channel to get access to perks:
   / @divathedivinelight  
Come join my private book club, we do readings, have discussions, win books, and have fun.
Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: https://streamyard.com/pal/4915991012...

17 U.S. Code § 107 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
U.S. Code
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1)the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2)the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3)the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4)the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

contact me: [email protected]
donation cash app: $DivaDivineLight
call or text: 347-336-9724