Скачать или смотреть Understanding std::runtime_error: The Enigma of Default Constructors in Inherited Classes

Explore why the `AError` exception class compiles in C+ + despite its parent class, `std::runtime_error`, lacking a default constructor, and learn the implications for exception handling.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63895033/ asked by the user 'mana' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14091616/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63895089/ provided by the user 'asmmo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9638272/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: The default constructor in an child of std::runtime_error

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding std::runtime_error: The Enigma of Default Constructors in Inherited Classes

In the world of C+ + , exception handling is often implemented through the use of custom exception classes that extend standard exception classes like std::runtime_error. However, when dealing with inheritance, things can get tricky—especially regarding constructor requirements. A common problem arises when you attempt to define an exception class, and you find that you need a default constructor for the parent class, but it doesn't exist. In this guide, we will examine this issue closely by discussing two specific exception classes: AError and BError, discovering why AError compiles successfully while BError results in a compilation error.

The Problem Statement

You have two exception classes that inherit from std::runtime_error in C+ + . The first class, AError, compiles without issues. Here is the class definition:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In contrast, the second class, BError, leads to a compilation failure due to the absence of a default constructor in std::runtime_error:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The question arises: Why does AError compile without error when it doesn't explicitly define its own constructor, while BError fails to compile?

Exploring the Solution

Default Constructors in Inheritance

A default constructor is a constructor that can be called without any arguments. In C+ + , when a derived class is instantiated, its constructor must call a constructor of its base class. If the base class does not have a default constructor, you must either provide the required constructor in the derived class or explicitly call another constructor from the base class.

Understanding AError

Implicit Constructor: The AError class is able to compile without an explicit constructor defined because C+ + provides a default constructor implicitly. However, it's important to note that this implicit default constructor tries to call the default constructor of its base class.

Compiler Behavior: In the case of AError, since the default constructor of std::runtime_error does not exist, if you indeed tried to create an instance of AError like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The code would not compile. Thus, AError technically should not compile if you try to instantiate it without any parameters.

Understanding BError

On the other hand, BError explicitly defines a constructor that takes an integer parameter. Here's the breakdown of why this leads to a compilation error:

No Default Constructor Available: When you try to create an object of BError using its constructor that accepts an integer, it effectively bypasses the need for a default constructor. However, it still needs to call a constructor of the std::runtime_error base class.

Explicit Constructor Requirement: Since std::runtime_error does not provide a default constructor, the code fails to compile because the language requires that a base class constructor be called during the object’s construction.

Conclusion: Key Takeaways

Inheritance and Constructors: When defining classes that inherit from other classes without a default constructor, you need to be mindful of how C+ + handles constructors.

Explicit Constructor Calls: If a base class lacks a default constructor, derived class constructors must explicitly call one of the available base class constructors.

Compiler Errors as Indicators: The compilation errors that arise provide crucial feedback on how constructors are intended to be used in your applications.

In summary, this example illustrates the importance of understanding constructors in class h