Скачать или смотреть Understanding constexpr Variable Initialization in C+ + 14

Discover why your `constexpr` variable must be initialized by a constant expression in C+ + 14 and learn how to fix it effectively.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68667348/ asked by the user 'Brandon' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1462718/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68667622/ provided by the user 'Quimby' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7691729/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: constexpr variable must be initialized by a const expression

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding constexpr Variable Initialization in C+ + 14

In modern C+ + , particularly with C+ + 14 and newer standards, developers often encounter concepts like constexpr, which allows variables to be computed at compile-time. However, this power comes with certain constraints, leading to some common pitfalls. One such issue involves a constexpr variable that must be initialized by a constant expression. This article aims to dissect a specific problem with constexpr in a C+ + program and provide clear solutions to overcome it.

The Problem: Initializing a constexpr Variable

Consider the following message you might encounter while compiling C+ + code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This appears when you are trying to assign a value to a constexpr variable without adhering to the necessary constraints. The code that generates this error, particularly if surrounded by conditional compilation directives, might look like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Under certain conditions, like when a specific macro is defined or undefined, this initialization fails due to the nature of how constexpr works. But why is this happening? Let’s break down the issue further.

Understanding constexpr and Its Constraints

The crux of the problem lies in how constexpr values are computed and what constraints they have. Below are the key points to understand:

constexpr Variables: These must be initialized with values that can be determined at compile time. This means the expression used for initialization should not depend on any run-time values or incomplete evaluations.

Function Parameters: In a function like log_base_10(T value), if you attempt to use a parameter to calculate another constexpr, it may result in complications. For example, if value is not inherently a compile-time constant, then the derived variable cannot be guaranteed as a constexpr.

Conditional Compilation (Preprocessor Directives): The use of conditionals (# ifdef WORKING_CODE) can lead to paths where certain variables must be constexpr, while in other cases, they don’t need to be, complicating the initialization process.

Clearing the Confusion: The Solution

To resolve this error effectively, the solution is straightforward. Instead of forcing an initialization that relies on potentially non-constant expressions, adjust your approach. Here’s how:

Simplifying Your Code

Instead of defining the index variable as constexpr, use a regular variable that does not impose compile-time constraints if it cannot guarantee a constexpr expression:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By changing constexpr auto index to just int index, you avoid the initialization issue because the index variable can now freely hold values without having to conform to the compile-time restrictions.

Conclusion

Understanding the limitations and requirements of constexpr in C+ + 14 can avoid many compilation headaches and improve code clarity. Remember, when initializing constexpr variables, ensure that all expressions and variables involved are genuinely constant expressions that can be evaluated at compile time. With practice, you will navigate these concepts with ease and create robust C+ + applications.

For further reading, dive into the official C+ + standards or comprehensive resources that cover constexpr in detail, and keep experimenting with your own code to solidify your understanding!