Скачать или смотреть Understanding Stack Argument Disappearance in Assembly with C Calling Conventions

Discover why stack arguments may disappear in x86 assembly code using C calling conventions and how to resolve such issues effectively.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68461236/ asked by the user 'lowlevellarry' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14948014/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68461452/ provided by the user 'Nate Eldredge' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/634919/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Stack arguments are disappearing in assembly using C calling convention

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Stack Argument Disappearance in Assembly with C Calling Conventions

When getting down to writing low-level x86 assembly code that interacts with the GNU C library (glibc), developers may face various challenges. One particularly perplexing issue that one might encounter is the disappearance of stack arguments when using C calling conventions. In this guide, we'll dive deep into this problem and elucidate the underlying causes and solutions.

The Problem at Hand

Imagine you are working on an assembly program using as and ld, and your expectation is to produce output like:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, upon executing your code, the output appears unexpectedly as:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Upon debugging the stack arguments, you discover that they seem to be disappearing. For instance, if you try to print an expected argument like Goodbye, it shows up as a blank line instead. This behavior can be quite unsettling!

Symptoms of the Problem

Missing expected arguments when passed to functions.

Unintended overwriting of string values leading to erroneous outputs.

Changes in the printed values that do not match expectations (e.g., printing a memory address instead of the actual string).

The next sections will help clarify why this happens and provide actionable solutions.

Understanding Stack Behavior

Stack Memory and Function Calls

In assembly language, when you make a function call, the arguments are pushed onto the stack. The C calling convention expects that these arguments will be retrieved correctly by the callee function. However, because assembly provides a low-level interface, the programmer must be aware of how memory allocation works, especially in relation to passed arguments.

The strcat Issue

In the code provided, the following line is a crucial point to analyze:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

It uses the strcat function, which concatenates one string to another. The issue arises when strcat modifies the string passed to it. Specifically, if it copies str1 onto str3, it overwrites the terminating null byte of str3 with a new character ('\n'). The consequences of this are:

The null byte indicating the end of str3 is lost.

This could lead to str4 being modified inadvertently since str4 is placed directly after str3 in memory.

Hence, when you try to access str4 later, it may not contain the expected value and may behave like an empty string.

Solutions to Prevent Argument Disappearance

1. Buffer Space Management

One quick fix is to ensure there's enough buffer space between your strings. For example, you could define the strings with additional spacing in your memory allocation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This method serves as a quick patch but does not solve the fundamental design concern.

2. Redesign the writeLine Function

A more elegant approach would be to redesign the writeLine function so it does not alter the strings provided to it. Instead of concatenating the newline character to the string, leave the string intact and use puts, which already appends a newline for you. Here’s a proposed adjustment:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

If you want to print an additional newline, you can call putchar separately, ensuring clarity and no overwriting of strings.

Conclusion

Navigating assembly language, especially with C calling conventions, can be daunting and filled with intricate challenges. By understanding how the stack operates and being mindful of function designs like writeLine, you can avoid common pitfalls such as argument disappearance. Remember, clean and efficient handling of memory and function a