Скачать или смотреть Resolving Multiprocessing.Pool.map Issues

Discover effective solutions to fix incorrect outputs from `Multiprocessing.Pool.map` in Python. Learn how to handle mutable arrays for accurate parallel computations.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64256939/ asked by the user 'Artur Müller Romanov' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7826511/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64257192/ provided by the user 'alani' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13596037/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Multiprocessing.Pool.map returns wrong values

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving Multiprocessing.Pool.map Issues: A Comprehensive Guide

If you're using Python's multiprocessing module and find that Pool.map is returning incorrect values, you're not alone. Many developers encounter this issue, especially when dealing with mutable objects like arrays. In this post, we'll explore a particular problem faced during parallel computations with Pool.map, analyze why it occurs, and provide effective solutions to ensure accurate outcomes.

The Problem at Hand

In the provided code snippet, the user aimed to conduct a series of computations across multiple iterations using a function executed via multiprocessing.Pool.map. The intended behavior involves calculating wave_line results using a worker_function in parallel across different nodes and iterations.

Initial Attempts

Here is the critical part of the code where the problem lies:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Upon running the above code, the user noticed that the results were inconsistent. The output from the worker_function correctly matched the manual calculations, but the results returned by Pool.map exhibited value overlaps and inaccuracies.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This seems to indicate that there is a value overlap, possibly due to shared mutable arrays.

Analyzing the Issue

The source of the problem is that the wave_line_mp array is mutable and is being modified by multiple processes without maintaining separate instances. Given that multiprocessing spawns separate processes, each of which may not have independent memory for shared objects, this can lead to unintended behavior if not handled correctly.

The Solution

To address this issue, we need to ensure that each process works with a unique copy of the wave_line_mp array. Let's explore two effective methods to fix this.

1. Making a Copy Inside worker_function

One straightforward fix is to create a copy of the mutable array at the beginning of the worker_function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This one-line change would ensure that each invocation of worker_function operates on a separate copy of the wave_line_mp, thus avoiding the overlap.

2. Initialize the Array Within worker_function

A more robust solution is to eliminate wave_line_mp from the function parameters and initialize it within the worker function's scope. Here’s how you can refactor the code:

Remove wave_line_mp from the function arguments:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Finally, eliminate any redundant resetting of the array:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With these adjustments, your computation will no longer suffer from shared state issues between processes.

Expected Output

After implementing these fixes, you can expect the outputs to align correctly, producing consistent results across all iterations:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

Handling mutable objects in multiprocessing can be tricky, but understanding the underlying mechanisms can help you navigate these issues efficiently. By ensuring that each process operates on its own copy of mutable data, you can prevent unintended side effects and achieve the desired outcomes.

Next time you're faced with similar challenges, remember these techniques to leverage Python's multiprocessing capabilities effectively!