Скачать или смотреть Combining Multiprocessing and Multithreading in Python: A Detailed Guide

Explore how to effectively combine `multiprocessing` and `multithreading` in Python for optimal performance in I/O bound tasks.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/69538094/ asked by the user 'CutePoison' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6224975/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69538896/ provided by the user '2e0byo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15452601/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Combine multiprocess and multithread in Python

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Combining Multiprocessing and Multithreading in Python: A Detailed Guide

In the world of Python programming, developers often encounter the need to optimize tasks that involve heavy I/O operations, such as making API calls or fetching data from a database. This raises an interesting question: Can we improve performance by combining multiprocessing and multithreading? In this guide, we will explore this topic in-depth, providing you with a thorough understanding of how to effectively approach the problem.

Understanding the Basics

Before diving into the solution, it's essential to clarify the fundamentals of both multiprocessing and multithreading in Python:

Multiprocessing allows you to create separate processes, each with its own Python interpreter and memory space. This is particularly useful for CPU-bound tasks, as it enables full utilization of multicore processors.

Multithreading, on the other hand, involves creating multiple threads within a single process. This is often more lightweight than creating multiple processes, making it suitable for I/O-bound tasks where waiting for external data can be significant.

The Limitation of Combining Both

You might think that leveraging both multiprocessing and multithreading simultaneously will yield better performance. However, this approach has its pitfalls:

High Costs of Process and Thread Creation

Spinning up a new process has a high overhead. Each process consumes a chunk of memory and involves a significant setup cost.

While threads are lighter, they still contribute to overhead when created and synchronizing states can add extra complexity.

Given these costs, continuously spinning up new processes and threads can result in diminishing returns. This leads us to consider a more efficient approach when faced with tasks comprising both I/O bound and CPU bound problems.

The Recommended Approach: Combining Multiprocessing with Asyncio

Instead of combining multiprocessing and multithreading, a more efficient solution exists: using asyncio along with multiprocessing. Let’s break down why this works effectively:

Benefits of Using Asyncio

Lower Overhead: By utilizing asyncio, you can operate with a single thread and leverage an efficient scheduling mechanism without the need for multiple threads or processes.

Resource Efficiency: Since asyncio operates in a non-blocking manner, it can handle many I/O operations concurrently without heavy memory consumption from additional threads or processes.

Implementation Strategy

Here’s a simple strategy for implementation:

Use asyncio for I/O Bound Tasks: Handle all the I/O-bound tasks in the main thread using asynchronous operations.

Offload CPU-Intensive Tasks: For any CPU-bound tasks that arise during the I/O operations, utilize a pool of worker threads to manage these processes efficiently.

This structure avoids the complexities and memory issues associated with mixing multithreading and multiprocessing within the same execution flow.

Conclusion

In summary, while the idea of combining multiprocessing and multithreading in Python might seem appealing, the inherent costs associated with creating and managing multiple processes and threads typically negate any performance gains. Instead, turning to asyncio for I/O-bound tasks while offloading CPU-bound tasks to worker threads presents a cleaner and more efficient solution.

Keep these principles in mind as you navigate your next Python project involving heavy I/O operations. With a smart approach to concurrency, you can enhance performance without falling into the traps associated with process and thread management.