Скачать или смотреть Resolving the C2665 boost::variant Error in MSVC 2017 Migration

A deep dive into addressing the `C2665 boost::variant` error encountered while migrating C+ + code from MSVC 2008 to MSVC 2017, including solutions and best practices.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63278605/ asked by the user 'SPlatten' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3697264/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63279807/ provided by the user 'Swift - Friday Pie' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2742717/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: C2665 boost::variant woes

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Troubleshooting the C2665 boost::variant Error in MSVC 2017 Migration

Migrating a C+ + application built with MSVC2008 to a more recent version such as MSVC2017 can be tricky, especially when there are changes in the underlying libraries. One of the common hurdles developers may encounter during this process is the C2665 boost::variant error. In this guide, we'll closely examine this error and its causes, as well as walk through how to effectively resolve it.

Understanding the C2665 boost::variant Error

While porting your application, you might come across the following error message:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This particular error usually indicates that the compiler is unable to find a suitable constructor for the type being used, in this case, CommandDataField. This situation arises from the way in which the Boost library's boost::variant expects types to be defined and how they are being used in your code.

Background Context

In the provided code, we have a class called CommandDataField which uses a type alias CDFVariant constructed from boost::variant. The constructor that is causing the issue is defined as:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, the template argument deduction fails during instantiation, leading to the compilation error because it attempts to treat CDFVariantList&& as CommandDataField&&. This creates a conflict with the boost::get function which expects a compatible type.

Step-by-Step Solution

To resolve this error, we need to make adjustments to the construction of the CommandDataField class and its constructors. Here’s how to do that:

1. Adjust Constructor Overloads

We need to clarify constructor overloads to avoid ambiguity. Consider these changes:

Define the Default Constructors

Removing unnecessary complexity can help streamline the class design. Use default constructors, destructors, copy constructors, and move constructors as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Simplify the Template Constructor

You can reduce confusion by simplifying the template constructor. Instead of trying to handle both rvalue and lvalue references separately with additional types, use a universal reference straightforwardly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

3. Handling CDFVariantList

To ensure conversions from CDFVariantList are valid, create an explicit constructor for CDFVariantList:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This makes sure that when a CDFVariantList is passed, it’s treated correctly, avoiding ambiguities.

Conclusion

With these modifications, you should be able to resolve the C2665 boost::variant error you encountered during your transition to MSVC 2017. It is crucial during such migrations to reassess the places where Boost libraries interact with your code and ensure those interactions conform to modern C+ + practices.

Summary of Key Changes

Simplified class constructors by implementing default constructors and clarifying the template constructor.

Added explicit handling for CDFVariantList to avoid casting issues.

Refactored unnecessary complexity in types and constructors.

These adjustments not only resolve the immediate compilation issues but also improve the overall clarity and maintainability of your code. If you continue to encounter problems, consider reviewing your usage of Boost libraries as well as associated types in your project.

By following these guidelines, you’ll be well-equipped to tackle challenges during C+ + migrations and updates. Happy coding!