鴨翼+三角翼與常規氣動佈局相比，優勢在哪？美軍為什麼不用鴨翼？陣風|幻象2000|F-1

Описание к видео 鴨翼+三角翼與常規氣動佈局相比，優勢在哪？美軍為什麼不用鴨翼？陣風|幻象2000|F-1

鴨翼、三角翼、常規佈局，這三者哪種更適合戰機？鴨翼+三角翼與常規佈局相比，可以顯著提高升力，比陣風M的起降距離很短。常規氣動佈局真的很弱嗎？美軍又為什麼一直選擇常規佈局？
Which of canard wing, delta wing and conventional layout is more suitable for fighters? Compared with the conventional layout, canard wing+delta wing can significantly improve the lift and has a shorter takeoff and landing distance than gust M. Is the conventional pneumatic layout really weak? Why did the US military always choose the conventional layout?
#火力就是正義#鴨翼#三角翼

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео