Скачать или смотреть How to Align Your Sklearn Accuracy Score with Actual Results in a Naive Bayes Model

Discover the essential steps to resolve discrepancies between your `Sklearn` accuracy scores and actual classification results when using a Naive Bayes classifier.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64093556/ asked by the user 'mikelowry' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11058930/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64099411/ provided by the user 'coldy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3414466/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Sklearn Accuracy Score does not match output results for Naive Bayes Classifer

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Align Your Sklearn Accuracy Score with Actual Results in a Naive Bayes Model

In the world of machine learning, accuracy is one of the most vital metrics. However, it can become confusing when the accuracy score reported by algorithms like Sklearn doesn’t align with your actual results. This discrepancy often leaves newcomers puzzled and frustrated. Today, we're addressing a common issue faced by data scientists: why the accuracy score for a Naive Bayes classifier in Python's Sklearn library can seem misleading at times.

The Scenario

You started with a labeled dataset of 500,000 strings, consisting of names of businesses and persons. You employed a simple Naive Bayes classifier to classify these strings into two categories: Business and Person. After training your model and generating predictions, your initial accuracy score appeared impressively high at around 95%. However, upon exporting results and comparing them to the actual labels, the accuracy dropped to a concerning 60%. So, why does this happen?

Understanding the Discrepancy

The Importance of Testing Data

When you evaluate the performance of your machine learning model, it’s crucial to use the right testing data. This is often a point of confusion, leading to large discrepancies in accuracy.

In your initial code snippet, the export was done with the entire original DataFrame, rather than utilizing the specific testing and prediction data. Here’s the critical factor to consider:

Training Data vs Testing Data: You're comparing results based on different datasets which can yield misleading performance metrics.

The Solution

To resolve the mismatch between your accuracy scores and the actual predictions, follow these steps:

Step 1: Update Your Code for Exporting

Instead of exporting the entire DataFrame with the original labels, change your export code to ensure you’re using only the test data and predictions. Here’s how you can do this:

Old Code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Updated Code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This modification will allow you to compare the predictions directly against the true labels from your testing set, providing a clearer insight into your model’s performance.

Step 2: Further Validation with Cross-Validation

For models that can yield misleading metrics due to sampling biases, using cross-validation is essential. This process involves dividing your dataset into subsets and allows you to train and test your model across these subsets. By doing so, you can gain a more thorough understanding of your model's robustness and potential accuracy across varying samples.

Step 3: Accurately Calculate Accuracy Score

When calculating accuracy, ensure you are comparing the predictions against the actual labels directly. Here’s how you can validate this correctly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

As with all things in machine learning, clarity is key. By using the correct dataset for predictions and paying close attention to evaluation methods, you can ensure that your accuracy scores reflect the real-world performance of your model. The next time you face a discrepancy in your Sklearn accuracy score for a Naive Bayes classifier, remember to validate the data being used and to leverage methods such as cross-validation to strengthen your results.

With these insights, you're better equipped to tackle any issues relating to model evaluation in the future.