Скачать или смотреть Understanding Java Stream Collect() Type Handling Issues

Learn how to tackle the `ConcurrentMap` type issue when using `collect()` in Java Streams. Understand Java's generics invariance and how to resolve the typing challenges effectively.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/73299265/ asked by the user 'pandaoverflow' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19730928/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/73299327/ provided by the user 'rgettman' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1707091/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Java Stream Collect() classifier can't detect type

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introduction

When working with Java Streams, especially with the collect() method, you may find yourself facing an unexpected issue – a type mismatch in your collected results. If you've ever tried grouping data with Collectors.groupingByConcurrent() and ended up with a ConcurrentMap<Object, ConcurrentMap<Object, Long>> instead of the expected Map<String, Map<String, Long>>, you're not alone. This guide will clarify why this happens and how to resolve it effectively.

The Problem

Here's a quick overview of the code that leads to this problem:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, you are attempting to group data based on two strings extracted from the lines of a text file. However, rather than returning the desired <Map<String, Map<String, Long>>>, the collect method defaults to returning a <ConcurrentMap<Object, ConcurrentMap<Object, Long>>, leading to potential confusion and errors in your application.

Understanding the Issue

The crux of the problem lies in Java's generics invariance. Invariance means that a generic class/type must match exactly in terms of its parameters. Here's why this issue arises:

Mismatch in Type Parameters: While ConcurrentMap indeed is a type of Map, the types that hold them (here, Object vs. String) must match precisely - generics in Java do not allow for wildcards or bounds to flexibly substitute types when collecting results.

Time of Capture: When you encounter the type mismatch message from the compiler, it is often a red herring. The compiler first identifies the invariance issue, which may prevent it from correctly inferring the actual string types due to the constraints imposed by your collect method.

Solutions to the Problem

Here are two effective approaches to resolve the issue:

1. Using Upper-Bounded Wildcards

You can modify the collection type you are returning to accommodate the underlying types correctly.
Change the return type to:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This tells the compiler to allow for any type extending Map<String, Long>, thus including the ConcurrentMap you are working with.

2. Explicit Type Specification

Alternatively, if you want to maintain clear and exact types, specify the collection type directly in your return statement:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This effectively informs the compiler about the exact type you are expecting in both the outer and inner collections, eliminating any ambiguity.

Conclusion

By understanding how Java handles generics and the implications of invariance in your type definitions, you can effectively troubleshoot and resolve common issues like the one discussed here. Applying either the upper-bounded wildcards or explicit type specification helps you ensure that your code compiles without errors, and you can continue developing your Java Stream-based applications with confidence.

Feel free to try out these solutions in your own code, and you'll see the benefits of precise type handling in Java Streams.