Скачать или смотреть Understanding C+ + Overflow Issues with Diagonal Calculations in Rectangular Prisms

Learn why your C+ + program returns unexpected results after 65536, and discover efficient solutions to handle large calculations without encountering overflow.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68391273/ asked by the user 'Lego Master' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/16453939/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68391454/ provided by the user 'Vasconcelos' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7703586/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: C+ + Math Weird After 65536

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding C+ + Overflow Issues with Diagonal Calculations in Rectangular Prisms

Have you ever faced unexpected results in your C+ + programs when dealing with seemingly simple calculations? If you've written a program to calculate the diagonal of a rectangular prism, you might have noticed a peculiar behavior when your inputs exceed certain values. In this post, we'll discuss a specific problem encountered when using integers in C+ + and how to fix it.

The Problem

A user faced an issue while trying to compute the diagonal of a rectangular prism using a C+ + program. The program worked flawlessly until it reached the input value of 65536. Beyond this point, the output mysteriously turned to 0, even if valid dimensions were provided.

Key Observations:

The program uses three integer inputs: length (l), width (w), and height (h), which can range from 1 to 100,000.

The output should only display when the diagonal's value is a whole number.

After reaching 65536, the results changed drastically, leading to confusion.

Understanding the Cause

The root of this issue lies in integer overflow—a situation that occurs when a calculation produces a value outside the range the data type can represent. In C+ + , the int data type typically has a size of 4 bytes (or 32 bits).

The Details Behind Overflow:

Binary Representation: The number 65536 in binary is 0000 0000 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000. This takes up 17 bits.

Calculation: When you square 65536, the result is 4,294,967,296. This value requires 33 bits for its binary representation (1 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000).

Storage Limitation: Since int can only hold 32 bits, the most significant bit (the leftmost one) gets discarded, leading to a stored value of 0.

How to Fix It

The solution to this problem is quite straightforward. You need to choose a data type capable of holding larger values.

Recommended Solutions:

Switch to long long or unsigned long long:

These integer types provide a significantly larger range for storing values.

For example, unsigned long long can store values up to 18,446,744,073,709,551,615.

Utilize Standard Integer Types:

Get familiar with types from the <cstdint> header. For instance, using uint64_t can help manage unsigned integers effectively.

This header defines fixed-width integer types, ensuring that you will not have overflow issues again.

Code Adjustment Example:

To implement the changes, you can modify your variable declarations:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

In programming, encountering errors due to overflow can be frustrating, especially with seemingly simple arithmetic operations. By understanding the limitations of the data types in C+ + and employing larger data types, you can prevent these issues. Make sure to embrace the use of types like long long and fixed-width integers for high-range calculations. By doing so, you'll pave the way for smoother and error-free programming experiences.

If you ever find yourself grappling with such numeric problems, now you know how to tackle them effectively!