Have We Been Wrong About PiStorm32?

Chip-ram speed conspiracy?

STATS FOR NERDS.

BUSTEST with CHIP RAM using various CPU add-on cards for A1200. I had run SysInfo in a video I had done. I compared its numbers interpretting them for their reletive values, not necessarily their asccuracy. This BUSTEST should be accurate results, now.

BUSTEST CHIP RAM RESULTS with MKIII INSTALLED
High Resolution Laced, 64 color.

PiStorm with MKIII:
readw 1452.6ns 1.4*10^6 bytes
readl 1496.2ns 1.2.7*10^6 bytes
readm 1459.2ns 2.7*10^6 bytes
writew 701.5 ns 2.9*10^6 bytes
writel 698.5ns 5.7*10^6 bytes
writem 698.6ns 5.7*10^6 bytes

TF1260 with MKIII:
readw 1180.6ns 1.7*10^6 bytes
readl 1161.8ns 1.3.4*10^6 bytes
readm 1154.6ns 3.5*10^6 bytes
writew 1109.9ns 1.8*10^6 bytes
writel 1083.9ns 3.7*10^6 bytes
writem 1084.4ns 3.7*10^6 bytes

GVP1230 with MKIII:
readw 1033.5ns 1.9*10^6 bytes
readl 1086.4ns 1.3.7*10^6 bytes
readm 1079.2ns 3.7*10^6 bytes
writew 1095.4ns 1.8*10^6 bytes
writel 1094.9ns 3.7*10^6 bytes
writem 1071.2ns 3.7*10^6 bytes

NO MKIII INSTALLED

PiStorm:
readw 1452.1ns 1.4*10^6 bytes
readl 1496.7ns 1.2.7*10^6 bytes
readm 1453.8ns 2.8*10^6 bytes
writew 690.5 ns 2.9*10^6 bytes
writel 697.5ns 5.7*10^6 bytes
writem 699.6ns 5.7*10^6 bytes

TF1260:
readw 1181.5ns 1.7*10^6 bytes
readl 1168.8ns 1.3.4*10^6 bytes
readm 1171.6ns 3.4*10^6 bytes
writew 1085.7ns 1.8*10^6 bytes
writel 1091.9ns 3.7*10^6 bytes
writem 1089.4ns 3.7*10^6 bytes

GVP1230:
readw 1079.8ns 1.9*10^6 bytes
readl 1105.9ns 1.3.8*10^6 bytes
readm 1179.2ns 3.5*10^6 bytes
writew 1101.1ns 1.8*10^6 bytes
writel 1094.9ns 3.7*10^6 bytes
writem 1071.5ns 3.8*10^6 bytes

Join this channel to get access to perks:
   / @holdandmodify