Скачать или смотреть Vance Tries To Hijack Trump's Iran Attack Plan As Arabs Scare US, Israel Fears Tehran? Protest

Vance Tries To Hijack Trump's Iran Attack Plan As Arabs Scare US, Israel Fears Tehran? Protest

A recent report describes an internal split in Donald Trump’s administration over possible military action against Iran amid large protests in that country. It frames Vice President JD Vance as pushing Trump toward military force — arguing that Trump had drawn a “red line” by warning Tehran not to kill protesters — while Arab allies and even Israeli officials were urging restraint to avoid a wider war.



Trump’s inner circle is divided on how aggressively to respond to Iran.

Vance, typically seen as skeptical of extended foreign wars, reportedly argued for firm action, saying Trump needed to enforce his own warnings.

Arab governments — from Saudi Arabia to Qatar — are reportedly pressuring the U.S. not to launch strikes, concerned about regional instability, economic fallout (especially oil markets), and retaliation.

The report also suggests Israeli leadership fears Tehran’s response and is cautious about any U.S. military escalation without broader support.



Independent reporting confirms that Gulf states like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Oman have been quietly — but repeatedly — warning the U.S. against military strikes on Iran, fearing:

escalation into a wider regional war,

serious disruption of oil exports and global markets,

violent responses from Iran’s proxies like Hezbollah or within Iraq and Yemen.


This diplomatic push appears to have influenced Washington’s calculus, with recent reporting noting signs of “de-escalation” and diplomatic engagement rather than immediate strikes.

”

While much international commentary assumes Israel uniformly wants the U.S. to attack Iran, recent reporting suggests Israeli leaders have been cautious about the timing and conditions of any U.S. military action.

According to a detailed account, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly urged Trump not to attack immediately because Israel wasn’t fully prepared for possible Iranian retaliation without strong U.S. support available.

That fits with broader reporting that, even among Israeli officials, there are concerns that a U.S.–Iran clash could spin out of control and threaten Israel’s security if not carefully managed.



Trump has used tough rhetoric toward Tehran, including threats tied to Iran’s nuclear and missile programs. U.S. strikes in 2025 targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, actions the administration described as setting back Iran’s capabilities while disclaiming a goal of full-scale war.

Vance himself has publicly argued that any such actions aren’t a war against Iran per se, but rather against its nuclear program — though this distinction is politically contentious.

Other U.S. voices, like Senator Lindsey Graham, have been even more aggressive in calling for military and cyber options against Iran’s leadership and infrastructure.




The backdrop for these deliberations includes ongoing mass protests in Iran over economic hardship and political repression — protests that some U.S. policymakers view as a potential internal pressure point on the regime. These protests have shaped Trump’s rhetoric and may be part of why some in his circle argue for tougher action.


---