Скачать или смотреть Cutlist optimizer QlyonCut vs Opticutter: 46 Real Tests Show 2.5% Material Savings

QlyonCut vs Opticutter: 46 Real-World Test Results

�� Key Findings:
• 2.5% average material savings across all test cases
• 73.9% win rate for QlyonCut (34 out of 46 cases)
• 95.7% performance consistency
• Best case improvement: 12.24%

🧪 Testing Methodology:
• 46 real customer projects (anonymized data)
• Identical test conditions for fair comparison
• Fixed sheet dimensions: 3660×2440
• Complete dataset publicly available

📈 What You'll Learn:
• Detailed performance comparison between two cutting optimization platforms
• Real-world test results with actual manufacturing data
• Performance distribution analysis across different complexity levels
• Current limitations and future development plans

🔗 Resources:
• Test the tool: qlyoncut.com
• Complete dataset: https://github.com/qlyoncut/opendata/tree/...
• Contact: [email protected]

📋 Current Status:
• Free for testing and feedback
• Subscription plans coming soon
• Basic features will remain free

🎯 Target Audience:
Manufacturing engineers, CNC operators, production managers, and anyone interested in material optimization and cutting efficiency.

#cutlist #optimizer #manufacturing #optimization #cutting #efficiency #CNC #engineering #material #waste #reduction #qlyoncut #opticutter