Скачать или смотреть Understanding Linked List Memory Allocation: Why Are Node Addresses the Same?

Discover why the `int` field in one linked list node can share the same address with the `char` field of the following node, and how to fix it in your C code.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68743406/ asked by the user 'Sagi Sason' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15442394/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68743790/ provided by the user 'Support Ukraine' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4386427/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why does the int field in the current node is the same as the string field at the next node in linked lists?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Linked List Memory Allocation: Why Are Node Addresses the Same?

When working with linked lists in C, memory allocation and management are crucial. A common issue you might encounter is observing that the int field of the current node is pointing to the same address as the char field of the subsequent node. This problem can be perplexing, especially if you're just starting with linked lists. Let’s dive deeper into understanding this phenomenon and how to resolve it effectively.

The Problem

Imagine you define your linked list as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In your program, you notice that the address of the address field in one node unexpectedly matches the address of the name field in the next node when printed. This raises questions about whether your memory allocation is correctly implemented, leading to potential data corruption or incorrect program behavior.

Analyzing the Code

To understand this issue, let’s focus on a specific part of your code within the function addToSmblTable:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Understanding sizeof(symbol)

Here, the symbol parameter represents a char*, not the Symbol struct. Therefore, when you use malloc(sizeof(symbol)), you're only allocating enough memory for the pointer, which is typically 4 or 8 bytes (depending on whether you are on a 32-bit or 64-bit architecture). This does not give you the adequate space to hold a whole Symbol struct, which comprises a char[32], an int, and a pointer to the next node.

The Consequences

Allocating too little memory leads to undefined behavior, including the circumstances you've described where the nodes overlap in memory space, resulting in the same address being allocated to both the address field and the next node's name field. This not only jeopardizes the integrity of your linked list but can also cause serious bugs as you manipulate nodes in your program.

The Solution

To correctly allocate memory for a new Symbol node, you should modify the code to ensure you're grabbing the size of a Symbol, not just a char*. You can do this by changing the allocation line as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, to make it even clearer and safer, consider using:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This statement dynamically allocates memory for the next node based on its type rather than the variable name, ensuring that it always allocates the correct amount of memory regardless of any changes in the struct's definition in the future.

Conclusion

By addressing the memory allocation correctly, you can prevent the mishap of two different fields sharing the same memory address in your linked list nodes. Always remember that understanding the types and sizes of your structures is essential for effective memory management, particularly in languages like C where manual memory allocation is key to avoiding common pitfalls.

In summary, ensure that your memory allocation reflects the structure's actual size. This will help in maintaining the integrity of your data structure and the overall functionality of your program.

If you encounter any further issues or have questions about your implementation, feel free to ask!