Скачать или смотреть Implementing Pessimistic Locking in DynamoDB with AWS Amplify and React

Learn how to implement `pessimistic locking` in your AWS Amplify applications using DynamoDB and React. This guide provides practical insights and code snippets for effective row editing management.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70562965/ asked by the user 'Tim' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/16425748/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70592155/ provided by the user 'August Lilleaas' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/26051/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Pessimistic locking with DynamoDB in Amplify / React

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Implementing Pessimistic Locking in DynamoDB with AWS Amplify and React

As developers, we often face the challenge of managing concurrent data modifications in our applications. One frequently discussed solution is pessimistic locking, particularly when multiple users need to edit shared data entries. In this guide, we'll explore how to implement pessimistic locking for your Amplify application using React and DynamoDB.

Understanding the Problem

In a scenario where users can modify rows in a DynamoDB table, you might find yourself needing to prevent simultaneous updates to the same row. By implementing a pessimistic lock, you can ensure that when a user begins editing a row, other users are notified that this row is currently being edited. This can help prevent conflicting changes and data inconsistency.

Unfortunately, DynamoDB does not natively support pessimistic locking. However, we can work around this limitation with some clever implementations. Here's how you might approach it.

Proposed Solution

Here are some structured steps to implement pessimistic locking in DynamoDB:

Step 1: Create a Secondary Table for Locks

New DynamoDB Table:

Create a second DynamoDB table that will manage locks for your main data table.

This table will store the unique ID of the rows being locked.

Step 2: Implement Locks Using Condition Expressions

Using Condition Expressions:

When a user wants to edit a row, you'll first try to create a lock for that item in the secondary table. This check should ensure that no other lock exists for the row being edited.

Here’s a code snippet to illustrate how to create a lock on an item:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, we ensure that there is no existing ItemLockId. If the lock is created successfully, the user can proceed to edit the item.

Step 3: Update and Release the Lock

Releasing the Lock:

After the user finishes editing, you need to remove the lock when saving changes. If the user has the correct ItemLockId, the lock can be safely deleted.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The putItem operation will fail if the lock ID doesn't match the one stored in DynamoDB, which helps enforce the integrity of our locking mechanism.

Conclusion

While DynamoDB itself does not provide built-in support for pessimistic locking, implementing a custom solution using condition expressions and a secondary table can effectively manage concurrent edits. By following the steps outlined in this guide, you can safeguard data integrity and enhance user collaboration in your AWS Amplify applications.

Good luck with your implementation, and feel free to share your thoughts or any challenges you encounter! :)