Скачать или смотреть Obsolete or Strategic? Unpacking Gripen's Real Value for Canada's Air Power

Obsolete or Strategic? Unpacking Gripen's Real Value for Canada's Air Power

Canada chose the F-35, but was the Saab Gripen actually the better fit for the Great White North? In this deep dive, we unpack the controversial "Future Fighter Capability Project" (FFCP) and analyze the Gripen's real strategic value. From its legendary Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) capabilities on snowy highways to its significantly lower operating costs, we explore if Canada prioritized "stealth hype" over Arctic sovereignty. Was the Gripen truly obsolete, or was it the ultimate "missed opportunity" for the RCAF? Let’s evaluate the air power debate that still rages in 2026.

Saab Gripen, Canada Air Force, RCAF, F-35 vs Gripen, FFCP, Canadian Defence, Arctic Sovereignty, Fighter Jet, Gripen E, Lockheed Martin, Canadian Military, Defense Spending, Jet Procurement, Gripen Canada, F-35 Lightning II, Military Aviation, Saab Canada, Air Power, Stealth vs Cost, Canada Fighter Replacement

#SaabGripen, #RCAF, #CanadaMilitary, #F35, #Gripen, #Aviation, #DefenseNews, #FighterJet, #ArcticSovereignty, #CanadianDefense, #Saab, #MilitaryTech, #AirForce, #JetComparison, #RCAFHistory, #DefenseBudget, #NationalSecurity, #FutureFighter, #MilitaryAviation, #Canada

The Gripen’s value for Canada wasn't about obsolescence, but about rugged, cost-effective sovereignty. While the F-35 offers elite stealth, the Gripen was designed for the harsh environments Canada defends. Ultimately, the rejection highlights a strategic shift toward NATO interoperability over the unique logistical needs of the Arctic frontier.