Скачать или смотреть Angry Lawyer Curses Out Client in Judge Boyd’s Court!

#CourtroomBreakdown #LegalAnalysis #TrafficCourt #LawAndOrder #CourtroomFiles #JudgeRuling #CaseDismissed #WashingtonLaw #LegalEducation #CourtDrama #RealCases #LegalTechnicality #JusticeServed #ProceduralLaw #courtroomscene

Angry Lawyer Curses Out Client in Judge Boyd’s Court!

This courtroom proceeding involves State of Texas vs. Daniel Marcato (2021 CR7975W) and centers on an alleged violation of community supervision (probation). The hearing begins with visible tension and confusion between the defendant and his attorney. The judge quickly intervenes, emphasizing courtroom decorum and respect after learning that the defendant allegedly made a disrespectful remark toward his lawyer. The judge makes it clear that regardless of personal feelings or job titles, everyone in the courtroom must be treated with respect, even if that respect has to be “faked.”

Initially, the defendant admits that he has not reviewed the Motion to Revoke Community Supervision or its first amendment with his attorney. Because of this, the judge pauses the proceedings and orders the defendant to review the documents properly with counsel before moving forward. There is also discussion about plea negotiations, which the judge reminds everyone are confidential. The defendant appears indecisive, expressing frustration, requesting a new attorney, and mentioning the possibility of an open plea, which further delays progress.

After a brief recess, the case is called again. This time, the judge formally reviews the allegations on the record. Marcato is accused of violating Condition Number One of his probation by allegedly committing possession of a controlled substance (PG1) in April 2022. The defendant pleads “not true,” stating that the case related to that charge is still pending.

The judge carefully explains the consequences of a “not true” plea, making it clear that there will be no plea deal or sudden change of position later. A contested hearing will take place, during which the state must present witnesses and prove the violation. If proven, the court will then decide whether Marcato will continue on probation or face revocation.

The matter is ultimately set for a contested hearing on June 6 at 1:30 p.m. The judge concludes by ensuring procedural clarity and instructing court staff to provide the defendant with reset paperwork, formally moving the case forward toward a full hearing.

Subscribe My Channel @EchoCourt-u3t
Disclaimer

This video and summary are for educational and informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance on your specific legal situation.