Скачать или смотреть Understanding Overloaded Assignment Operators in C+ + : Common Errors and Solutions

Discover why overloaded assignment operators can lead to errors in C+ + and learn how to resolve these issues effectively for smoother coding.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63655249/ asked by the user 'H-005' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13647419/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63655276/ provided by the user 'leslie.yao' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3309790/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why do I get errors when I use the overloaded assignment operator, but I don't get using the compiler-supplied one?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Overloaded Assignment Operators in C+ + : Common Errors and Solutions

When programming in C+ + , you may sometimes find yourself facing frustrating compilation errors, particularly with operator overloads. One common issue arises when using overloaded assignment operators. If you've ever wondered, "Why do I get errors when I use the overloaded assignment operator, but I don't get using the compiler-supplied one?" you're not alone. This guide aims to clarify that question and provide a structured approach to fixing the problem.

The Problem

Let's say you have a C+ + class that utilizes an overloaded assignment operator. The goal of overloading an operator is to create a custom way to assign values to objects of that class. However, when implementing your own version of the assignment operator (operator=), you might encounter errors that do not occur with the compiler-supplied one.

Example Error

In a specific case involving a class named BigInt, the developer faced the following error when attempting to return from an overloaded operator + :

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error occurred in the context of calling the overloaded assignment operator but didn’t arise when using the compiler-supplied version. But why is this happening?

Exploring the Solution

The source of the problem lies in the return type of the overloaded assignment operator. Let’s break down the solution step by step.

1. Understanding Return Types

In C+ + , your overloaded assignment operator's return type plays a crucial role. The original or compiler-generated assignment operator usually returns a reference to the current object (*this), which allows for chaining assignments. However, if your overloaded operator returns void, it cannot be used in expressions that expect a value to be returned.

2. Correcting the Overloaded Assignment Operator

To fix the issue, change the return type of your overloaded assignment operator to BigInt&. Here's how you can modify the method:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Changes Explained

Return Type: Changing the return type to BigInt& instead of void allows the operator to return a reference to the current object, enabling the use of this operator in expressions like return res = a.BigInt::operator - (b);.

Returning *this: By returning *this, the operator facilitates chaining and maintains the expected functionality of an assignment operator.

Conclusion

To summarize, if you find yourself facing errors related to overloaded assignment operators in C+ + , take a moment to review your return types. By ensuring your overloaded operator= returns a reference to the calling object, you can alleviate these issues and enhance the functionality of your class.

If you would like to delve deeper into C+ + operator overloading or encounter other nuances in your programming journey, feel free to reach out for more discussions or clarifications. Happy coding!