Скачать или смотреть How to Simplify Mapping from a Tuple in C- with AutoMapper

Discover how to efficiently map from a tuple to an object using AutoMapper in C-, without specifying each member field.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68975014/ asked by the user 'Question3r' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7764329/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68975116/ provided by the user 'pfx' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9200675/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to map from a tuple without specifying each member field?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Simplify Mapping from a Tuple in C- with AutoMapper

In C- development, you might often find yourself needing to consolidate data from multiple sources into a single object. When using the AutoMapper library, this can become cumbersome, especially when working with tuples. In this guide, we will explore how to effectively map from a tuple to a custom object without having to specify each member field explicitly. We will also discuss alternative strategies to make your code more concise and readable.

Understanding the Problem

Consider the following classes that represent a user and a to-do item in your application:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You want to map instances of User and Todo into an instance of UsernameWithTodoTitle. To achieve this using AutoMapper, a common approach involves specifying each field within a mapping profile, as shown below:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

As you can see, this approach can get tedious, particularly since AutoMapper relies on the tuple structure to know where to find the source data. But what if we could simplify this mapping?

A Cleaner Solution

Avoiding Tuples for Simplicity

Instead of using tuples, we can opt to perform separate mappings from User and Todo directly to UsernameWithTodoTitle. This simplifies our code significantly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this configuration, you can create an instance of UsernameWithTodoTitle in two steps:

Map the User to UsernameWithTodoTitle.

Update the resulting object with data from Todo.

Here's how it looks in practice:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Leveraging Tuples with IncludeMembers

If you prefer to keep using tuples, there’s a concise way to define your mapping using the IncludeMembers method. By doing so, you can avoid redundancy in your mapping rules:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using named tuple elements is another best practice, which enhances code clarity:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Full Mapping Example

Here's how the complete mapping setup would look if you choose to use all the suggested methods:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

Mapping data from tuples to custom objects in C- using AutoMapper doesn’t have to be a laborious task. By avoiding unnecessary tuple specifications and leveraging the mappings effectively, you can keep your code concise and maintainable. Whether you choose to work with separate class mappings or tuples, employing the strategies discussed in this post can significantly simplify your mapping profiles.

Make sure to evaluate your use case and adopt the approach that best fits your application’s architecture!