Скачать или смотреть How to Implement a Generic Protocol with Default Implementation in Swift

Discover how to effectively implement a generic protocol with a default implementation in Swift. Understand common pitfalls and learn best practices to streamline your code.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/76905153/ asked by the user 'Gargo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/805701/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/76905260/ provided by the user 'Dávid Pásztor' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4667835/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Implement generic protocol which already has a default implementation?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introduction

In the world of Swift programming, generic protocols with default implementations can greatly simplify your code and increase flexibility. However, you might encounter challenges when trying to implement them correctly. In this guide, we'll dive into a common issue: how to properly utilize a generic protocol that already has a default implementation, while maintaining code clarity and efficiency.

The Problem

You may find yourself in a situation where you've defined a protocol with a default method implementation, but when you conform to this protocol in another class, the default implementation is no longer available. This can lead to redundant code and might make your implementation unnecessarily complex.

Let's look at a hypothetical problem. In the case presented, we have a protocol named GetAllDBServiceProtocol that is designed to fetch data from a database. This protocol provides a default implementation through an extension. However, when implementing the protocol in a class, the default behavior is not accessible as expected.

Analyzing the Existing Code

Here's a brief overview of the original code you're working with:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You'll notice that in the protocol definition, the method getall has been spelled with a lowercase "a", while the method in the extension is spelled getAll with an uppercase "A." This difference is crucial and can lead to problems later on.

Key Points in the Original Protocol

Associated Type Mistake: The associated type is not properly utilized in conforming types.

Method Naming: The method name typo prevents the default implementation from being recognized.

The Solution

To resolve the issue and leverage the default implementation, we need to ensure that:

The method names are consistent.

The associated type is properly defined in the conforming class.

Let's rewrite the original code with these points in mind:

Updated Protocol Definition

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

DBStorageService Class

To fetch data, make sure your data service class looks like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Concrete Implementation

Now, let's implement a concrete service that uses the default protocol implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

With these adjustments, SomeDBService can now properly utilize the default implementation of getAll() provided by GetAllDBServiceProtocol. This allows you to write cleaner and more maintainable code, leveraging the power of generic protocols effectively.

Final Thoughts

In summary, when working with generic protocols in Swift, careful attention to method naming and associated types can prevent common pitfalls. Always ensure that your protocol adheres to consistent naming conventions and thoughtfully utilizes its default implementations. Happy coding!