Скачать или смотреть Why UNITED NATIONS 🇺🇳 is IRRELEVANT, OBSOLETE and USELESS in TODAY’s WORLD 🌍

#unitednations #usa #russia

#candle4ssr #happybirthdaysuriya #10yearsof1D
#houston #10yearsofonedirection #cbiforsushant
#candleforsushant #geraldo #pfizer
#jeffbezos #wecharity #china

#nonsense_modi #wakeupMHRD #rajeevmasand #nonsensesambitpatra #resignkeralacm #nord
#kanyewest #tucker #drake

#hinduism #tiktok #trumpconspiracy
#prayforye #giants #reliance

#oneplusnord ‪ #मोदी_का_रामराज्य‬ #nomoredelay
‪ #राम_भक्त_मोदी‬ #soniajinrahulping #bjpcoronasarkar
#ipl2020 #trumpmeltdown #covid19
#wecharity #boycottmlb #tuesdaythoughts



Why UNITED NATIONS 🇺🇳 is IRRELEVANT, OBSOLETE and USELESS in TODAY’s WORLD 🌍

Criticism of the United Nations has encompassed numerous arguments regarding various aspects of the organization, such as policy, ideology, equality of representation, administration, ability to enforce rulings, and ideological bias.

In this video we are going to see why the UN is irrelevant, obsolete and useless.


Firstly, the UN has been silent in the face of genocide and terrorism that occurred between its founding period and the present day. While the UN during its founding period was limited to those countries that declared war on at least one of the Axis powers of World War II, and thus were capable of taking a stand against war, the modern United Nations has become diluted to the point where only 75 of the 184 member states are democracies. This had the effect of tipping the scales of the UN so that the organization as a whole was more likable to the requirements of dictatorships.

Secondly, there have been controversy and criticism of the UN organization and its activities since at least the 1950s. In the United States, an early opponent of the UN was the John Birch Society, which began a "get US out of the UN" campaign in 1959, charging that the UN's aim was to establish a "One World Government."
Charles de Gaulle of France criticized the UN, famously calling it le machin, and was not convinced that a global security alliance would help in maintaining world peace, saying UN cannot direct defense treaties between countries.


Thirdly, there has been criticism that the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States), who are all nuclear powers, have created an exclusive nuclear club whose powers are unchecked. Unlike the General Assembly, the United Nations Security Council does not have true international representation. This has led to accusations that the UNSC only addresses the strategic interests and political motives of the permanent members, especially in humanitarian interventions: for example, protecting the oil-rich Kuwaitis in 1991 but poorly protecting resource-poor Rwandans in 1997.


Lastly, another criticism of the Security Council involves the veto power of the five permanent members. As it stands, a veto from any of the permanent members can halt any possible action the Council may take. One country's objection, rather than the opinions of a majority of countries, may cripple any possible UN armed or diplomatic response to a crisis. As part of the Soviet Union, Russia vetoed 90 resolutions between 1949 and 1991. As of today, USSR and Russia vetoed 141 times, United States 83 times, UK 32 times, France 18 times, and China 14 times.


Find this show on other social media platforms :

Facebook :   / theamolkhedkarshow  

YouTube English :    / theamolkhedkarshow  

YouTube Marathi :    / @theamolkhedkarshow-marathi  

Instagram :   / theamolkhedkarshow  

Twitter :   / amolkhedkarshow  

LinkedIn :   / the-amol-khedkar-show  

Telegram : https://t.me/TheAmolKhedkarShow

Blog : https://amolkhedkar.wordpress.com/about/

#TheAmolKhedkarShow