Скачать или смотреть Understanding How to Implement CHECK Constraints in PostgreSQL

This guide delves into creating efficient `CHECK` constraints in PostgreSQL, specifically addressing the nuances of expression evaluation and representation. Learn how to document your constraints to maintain clarity and integrity in your database design.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67217907/ asked by the user 'rado' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3026886/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67218113/ provided by the user 'Laurenz Albe' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6464308/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: check constraint being printed without parenthesis

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Creating Effective CHECK Constraints in PostgreSQL

When designing a database schema, one of the critical aspects you need to consider is how to enforce rules on the data. In PostgreSQL, CHECK constraints are a powerful way to ensure the integrity of the data in your tables. However, sometimes we encounter issues with the representation of these constraints, which can lead to confusion. Today, we will explore a common problem with CHECK constraints and how to handle it effectively.

The Problem at Hand

Let’s consider an example for an e-commerce checkout system. The goal is to store various ranges of values for checkout purposes – for instance:

Values until $20

Values starting from $400

Values between $30 and $300

We want to enforce a rule where only one of the start_value or end_value can be null, and if both have values, start_value must be less than end_value. The initial approach involved using a CHECK constraint, leading to the following SQL structure:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While this structure works as intended, when querying the table with \d checkout_value, the output format for the CHECK constraint appears without parentheses, leading to potential misunderstandings:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This raises the concern: Is this a bug? How do we ensure clarity in documenting these constraints?

Understanding the Output

To clarify, it’s important to understand how PostgreSQL evaluates CHECK constraints. The reason for the absence of parentheses in the printed output is due to the operator precedence in SQL expressions. Here's a quick explanation:

The AND operator binds more strongly than the OR operator.

Consequently, both your original expression and the one without parentheses will evaluate the same way since PostgreSQL parses expressions, not just represents them as strings.

Ensuring Clarity in Your Constraints

While the absence of parentheses does not change the logic of your constraint, it’s still a good practice to document your constraints clearly to avoid confusion among team members or when revisiting the schema in the future. Here are a few tips you can follow:

Use Comments in SQL Statements: Adding comments directly in your SQL can provide context for future readers.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Document in a Separate Database Documentation: Maintain a separate document that outlines the purpose of each constraint and any assumptions made. This will be helpful for new team members or during audits.

Test Your Constraints: Always test your constraints with various input scenarios to ensure they behave as expected, especially when working without explicit parentheses.

Conclusion

Building a robust database schema requires attention to detail, especially regarding constraints. By understanding the evaluation of CHECK constraints and adopting best practices for documentation, you can maintain clarity in your database design. Remember, while PostgreSQL handles the logical correctness of your constraints under the hood, presenting them clearly can save time and prevent errors in the long run.

Now you're equipped to handle CHECK constraints in PostgreSQL with confidence! If you have any questions or need further clarification, feel free to reach out!