Скачать или смотреть Resolving PostgreSQL Update Query Issues with Inner Join: A Comprehensive Guide

Understand why your PostgreSQL update query might be updating every row and learn how to fix it effectively with inner joins.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63333144/ asked by the user 'Subhendu Mahanta' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/353557/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63333178/ provided by the user 'Gordon Linoff' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1144035/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: postgresql update query with inner join

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving PostgreSQL Update Query Issues with Inner Join: A Comprehensive Guide

If you've ever faced issues with an update query in PostgreSQL that modifies every row to the same value, you're not alone. This common obstacle can be frustrating, especially when you're confident in your SQL skills. In this blog, we will dissect a specific problem involving an update query that misbehaves and provide an effective solution.

The Problem

Imagine you have the following query:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

On execution, this query updates every row in the survey_library table to the same value, causing unexpected results.

The Solution

The key to understanding this problem lies in how PostgreSQL interprets the query structure, especially in the FROM clause. Let’s clarify the solution step-by-step.

Step 1: Remove the Redundant Table Reference

In PostgreSQL, when you include the table that you are updating in the FROM clause, it creates a new reference to that table. This is interpreted as a CROSS JOIN, which will lead to every row being updated with the same value. Instead, you should only reference the FROM clause indirectly.

Step 2: Correcting the Query

Here's the corrected version of your query:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breakdown of the Correct Query

Use of the FROM clause: Notice that we've removed the direct reference of survey_library lib in the FROM clause. We are now only using the subquery v to get the aggregated values and linking it with the WHERE clause.

Link via WHERE: The WHERE condition specifies that you only want to update survey_library lib where lib.id matches the template_id from the subquery results. This is crucial for ensuring that only the intended rows are modified.

Conclusion

By following the steps outlined above and understanding the structure of your SQL queries, you can avoid common pitfalls in PostgreSQL. This specific issue related to your update statement highlights the importance of query syntax and its impact on the results. Now you can confidently tackle similar challenges and ensure your database operations execute correctly.

Remember, while PostgreSQL is a powerful tool for handling databases, it's essential to understand how its SQL syntax works to prevent errors that can lead to significant issues in your data management. Happy querying!