Скачать или смотреть Understanding the space complexity of str.substr() in C+ +

Discover the space complexity differences between `str.substr()` and `str.erase()` functions in C+ + that can significantly impact memory usage in your applications.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63503371/ asked by the user 'Yashvi' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8313273/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63503436/ provided by the user 'bruno' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2458991/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Space complexity of str.substr() in C+ +

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Space Complexity of str.substr() in C+ +

In the world of programming, particularly in C+ + , understanding the memory and space complexity of different functions can be crucial for optimizing your applications. One common area of confusion is the difference between the str.substr() and str.erase() functions. In this post, we'll take a closer look at the space complexity of the str.substr() function and why you might experience such a stark difference in memory usage when replacing it with str.erase().

The Problem: High Memory Usage with str.substr()

A user shared their experience on LeetCode, where running a specific function caused a massive memory consumption of 150MB. The function in question was:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This raised a valid concern: How does str.substr() use memory compared to str.erase()? When they replaced substr with:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The memory usage drastically dropped to 6.8MB. This stark contrast begs for a deeper understanding of how each function operates.

Analyzing str.substr()

How str.substr() Works

The substr() function is designed to create a new string that is a copy of a portion of the original string. Here’s a quick breakdown of its workings:

Creates a Copy: When you call num.substr(1, num.size()), you're asking for a new string that contains all characters starting from index 1 all the way to the end of the original string.

Temporary Memory Use: While this function creates a new string, it means you're temporarily holding two versions of the string in memory—the original and the new substring. This can effectively double the memory usage until the old string is discarded.

Space Complexity Implications

The key takeaway from using substr() is that it results in increased space complexity, specifically:

Memory Requirement: You need nearly double the space of the original string because you're holding both the new and old strings in memory simultaneously until the old one is no longer referenced.

This is particularly significant if you deal with large strings or run this operation in a memory-constrained environment.

Exploring str.erase()

How str.erase() Works

On the other hand, the erase() function modifies the string in place without creating a copy. Here’s how it operates:

In-Place Modification: When you call num.erase(0, 1), the first character is removed, and the remaining characters shift left to occupy the space previously held by the removed character.

Single Version in Memory: As a result, you only have the modified version of the string in memory, significantly reducing memory usage.

Space Complexity Implications

The str.erase() function is highly efficient concerning memory since:

Memory Requirement: It only maintains a single version of the string in memory, drastically lowering the peak memory usage to what is almost equivalent to your original string size minus one character.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when deciding between using str.substr() and str.erase(), consider these important distinctions in memory management:

Use str.substr() for: Situations where you truly need to work with a copy of a part of the string.

Opt for str.erase() when: You can modify the original string, resulting in significant memory savings.

By understanding the differences in space complexity between these two functions, you'll be better equipped to make efficient choices in your C+ + programming endeavors, especially when working with strings.

Remember, like many coding decisions, the best choice often depends on the specific context of your application, so always consider the trade-offs in complexity and memory usage before making a deci