Learn how JavaScript array functions can behave like tagged template literals. Discover the implementation details and when to use this feature effectively!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62664074/ asked by the user 'evayly' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6599635/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62664286/ provided by the user 'FZs' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8376184/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why do array functions work like tagged template literals and what can I do with it?
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Exploring the Magic of Tagged Template Literals in JavaScript Array Functions
In the world of JavaScript, developers are often intrigued by the language's flexibility and features. One such interesting behavior is how certain array functions can operate like tagged template literals. This might leave many wondering: Why does this happen, and what can I do with it? In this post, we'll delve into this phenomenon and decode how it works.
Understanding Array Functions as Tagged Template Literals
What Are Tagged Template Literals?
Tagged template literals allow you to define a function that processes a template string and its interpolations. When you call a function as a tag, it receives two main parameters:
Array of static string parts
Substitution values (zero or more)
In this article, we are specifically looking at the behavior of array functions like split() when they're called in this manner.
The Example in Action
Consider the following code snippet:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
At first glance, it may appear unconventional that we can use the split() function without parentheses, yet this is indeed valid syntax.
What's Happening Under the Hood?
When you use str.split as a tagged template, it actually unwraps to:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Here's the breakdown of the mechanics:
The split() method expects a string or regular expression as its first argument.
In our case, it's called with an array, which is then converted to a string using the toString() method.
Specifically, Array# toString() joins the elements of the array with commas. For a single element array like [' '], the result is simply the space character (' ').
Thus, str.split(' ') is effectively performed, yielding an array with elements ["foo", "bar"].
Limitations of Using This Feature
While this might seem like a neat trick, there are several caveats to consider:
Readability: Using array functions as tagged template literals can lead to less readable code. It’s not immediately clear what’s happening, which can confuse other developers or future you.
Performance: The approach creates additional arrays, which can introduce overhead in performance-sensitive applications.
Minor Savings: This method only saves two characters in the syntax ( instead of (' ')), which may not justify its use.
When is it Useful?
Despite the drawbacks, there are some scenarios where using functions as tagged template literals can be handy, primarily for specific tools or minifiers that utilize this syntax to save space. However, for most typical use cases, sticking to standard function calls will maintain clarity and performance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the idea of using array functions like split() with tagged template literals is an intriguing aspect of JavaScript, it’s essential to understand both the mechanics behind it and the implications of doing so. For the sake of readability and performance, it’s usually best to use the conventional method.
Feel free to explore this feature, but use it judiciously!
Информация по комментариям в разработке