Explore the reasons behind the prioritization of `MutationObserver` callbacks and promises in the microtask queue over the macrotask queue, and how this impacts the rendering of updates in the DOM.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/78181757/ asked by the user 'soumitra' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3813348/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/78182460/ provided by the user 'Alexander Nenashev' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14098260/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why mutation observer is processed with microtask queue and not macrotask queue?
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Why Does MutationObserver Use the Microtask Queue?
In the realm of JavaScript, understanding how tasks are queued and executed is crucial for effective coding and seamless user experiences. One area that often confuses developers is the working dynamics of MutationObserver and the task queues. This guide delves into a common question: Why are MutationObserver callbacks processed in the microtask queue instead of the macrotask queue?
The Problem at Hand
When we think of task execution in JavaScript, it’s helpful to recognize the two primary task queues:
Macrotask Queue: Handles tasks like user interactions (clicks, input events) and timers (setTimeout).
Microtask Queue: Dedicated to promises and MutationObserver callbacks.
A developer raised a valid concern: If user actions are crucial, shouldn’t they take precedence in the processing stack? Why are MutationObserver callbacks, which respond to changes in the DOM, prioritized higher than actions based on user input?
The Solution Explained
To tackle this query, let’s break down the reasons behind the design choice for using the microtask queue for MutationObserver:
1. Render Timing and Visual Consistency
Rendering Process: The DOM rendering happens at the end of each macrotask. If MutationObserver callbacks were executed in a macrotask, any DOM updates made within those callbacks would occur after the rendering. This would lead to flickering or screen tearing, because the rendering would reflect the state of the DOM before these updates.
Immediate Updates: By processing MutationObserver callbacks in the microtask queue, updates can be made immediately before the next rendering occurs, ensuring a smooth visual experience.
2. Prevent Infinite Recursion
Excessive Events: If MutationObserver were synchronous (i.e., executed in the macrotask queue), it could lead to a flood of mutation events, especially if multiple DOM updates are made. This chain reaction could potentially lead to infinite recursion, which would crash the script.
Controlled Execution: Using the microtask queue allows for queued tasks to execute after the current task, preventing excessive events and maintaining control over the mutation process.
3. Sync Phase Stability
Settled DOM State: In the callback of a MutationObserver, the DOM is in a "settled" state. This means any mutations made within the callback have a clear state of the DOM at that moment, leading to better control for developers.
Better Coordination: When handling updates to styles or attributes, it ensures that all changes happen in a set order, minimizing discrepancies between the pointer position and the updated DOM elements.
Real-World Example
In the provided code snippet, we demonstrate how the MutationObserver operates alongside event listeners.
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
By placing the pointer’s position changes and the related DOM updates within a microtask, we ensure that all mutations are processed promptly and coherently, preventing any out-of-sync rendering.
Conclusion
Understanding the mechanics of MutationObserver and its role in the microtask queue is fundamental for developers who want to create smooth, efficient web applications. This design choice optimally balances the need for immediate DOM updates against the potential pitfalls of excessive events and screen tearing, ultimately leading to a better user experience.
By grasping these concepts, you can leverage MutationObserver effectively in your applications, ensuring a responsive and consistent UI regardless of user interactions.
Информация по комментариям в разработке