Скачать или смотреть The Most EVIL BABYSITTERS In History | When Caretakers Became Killers

The Most EVIL BABYSITTERS In History | When Caretakers Became Killers

Parts 1–2 → Louise Woodward (UK/USA, 1997)
Teen au pair convicted in Boston “shaken baby” case. Trial rocked by expert testimony and sentencing controversy.
Parts 3–4 → Christine Falling (USA, 1980s)
“Baby sitter from hell” who smothered children she was hired to care for. Forensic pathology exposed her.
Parts 5–6 → Nathaniel Bar-Jonah (USA, 1990s)
Babysitter with long history of child predation. Linked to disappearances, grotesque rumors of cannibalism.
Parts 7–8 → Yoselyn Ortega (USA, 2012)
Trusted nanny in New York who killed the two children she cared for. Courtroom battle centered on mental illness claims.
Parts 9–10 → Genene Jones (USA, 1980s)
Already covered as a nurse, but reframed in babysitter/caretaker role — parents trusted her in pediatric ICU. Infant deaths linked to her.
Parts 11–12 → Olivia Rönning (Sweden, 1990s)
Case of a teenage babysitter involved in neglect leading to death. Rare European case where caregiver liability drew national debate.
Parts 13–14 → Karen McCulloch (UK, 1990s)
Babysitter who set house fire leading to deaths of children in her care. Forensic arson analysis cracked the case.
Part 15 → Amanda Taylor (USA, 2000s)
Sometimes called the “Selfie Killer,” also had a stint as babysitter/childminder. Used role of trust before escalation into murder.
Part 16 → Casey Anthony (USA, 2008)
Not a babysitter — but the case revolves around the fabricated “Zanny the Nanny” lie. Included here as a cautionary twist on trust in caregivers.
Part 17 → Historic Case – Amelia Dyer (UK, 19th century)
“The Baby Farmer.” Took in infants for money, then killed them. Estimated 200+ victims. One of history’s most prolific child killers.
Part 18 → Final Reflection – “When Care Became a Curse”
Closing theme: parents hand over children believing in safety. Each betrayal shows how fragile that bond is when oversight collapses.

⚠️Copyright Disclaimer:
We do not own the rights to the images or clips used. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, and research. All materials have been repurposed under fair use for educational and documentary purposes.