Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Use of IProgress in Repository Interfaces: A Design Pattern Approach

Explore the intricacies of repository interfaces in C# and how to effectively manage progress reporting using `IProgress`. Learn the best practices to maintain a clean architecture without confusion.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71196934/ asked by the user 'Scuzzlebutt' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2949093/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/71197244/ provided by the user 'Stefan' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2416958/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Repository Interface with (or without) IProgress

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Use of IProgress in Repository Interfaces: A Design Pattern Approach

When developing applications that need to interact with databases or web APIs, establishing a clear communication protocol through interfaces is crucial. One common challenge arises when implementing repository patterns that require progress reporting, especially when dealing with large data transfers. In this guide, we will dissect a common scenario regarding the IProgress implementation within repository interfaces, discussing the problem at hand and presenting various solutions.

The Problem: Need for Progress Reporting

Imagine you have a IPersonRepository interface defined for handling user data. With different implementations—one connecting directly to a database and the other accessing data via a web API—your application is structured well. However, when it comes to extracting large datasets for offline use, you stumble upon a dilemma.

When clients download extensive data, you want to provide feedback on the download progress. This requires incorporating an IProgress parameter in your repository interface.

Current Implementations

1. Database Implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. API Implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While the above implementations function correctly for singular data retrieval, they lack the capability to notify progress during extensive data downloads required for offline usage.

The Need for IProgress

To address this, we can create a new repository, ApiDatabaseRepository, that includes an IProgress parameter:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Dilemma with IProgress for SQL

For your SqlDatabaseRepository, the question arises: should it also accept IProgress, even if it’s not needed? The straightforward answer might seem to be adding it as an optional parameter:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, this could lead to confusion, as it suggests that progress is reported when it is actually ignored.

Possible Solutions: Consistency vs. Clutter

There are multiple paths to take in redesigning your architecture:

1. Maintain a Consistent Interface

The simplest approach is to retain a consistent interface, even if it occasionally results in "not entirely implemented" callbacks. This leads to a more straightforward API consumer experience. Here's how you can opt for this approach:

Allow all repositories to accept IProgress, even if some do not use it.

Ensure the documentation clearly states which implementations utilize progress reporting.

2. Use Alternative Patterns

Consider alternative design patterns:

Events: Use events to report progress rather than incorporating IProgress directly. This allows clients to subscribe to progress notifications.

Callback Methods: Pass a callback function to facilitate progress reporting. This maintains flexibility while potentially providing clearer semantics.

3. Separate Interfaces

While maintaining two separate interfaces can help clarify use cases where progress reporting is unnecessary, this approach may increase complexity. It also might lead to additional logic at the caller level, which ideally should be avoided.

Conclusion: Finding the Right Balance

In conclusion, when dealing with repository interfaces and progress reporting in your C# applications, it’s essential to balance the need for a consistent design with practical implementation concerns.

Key Takeaway: While including IProgress across all repository implementations may appear redundant, it enhances consistency and clarity for the developers using these interfaces. Documenting behaviors and potential