Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть Special Report #4 - Federal Power v. State Rights: MN Takes on ICE -The 10th Amendment Clash in MN

  • The Republic - If You Can Keep It
  • 2026-01-29
  • 5
Special Report #4 - Federal  Power v. State Rights: MN Takes on ICE -The 10th Amendment Clash in MN
  • ok logo

Скачать Special Report #4 - Federal Power v. State Rights: MN Takes on ICE -The 10th Amendment Clash in MN бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно Special Report #4 - Federal Power v. State Rights: MN Takes on ICE -The 10th Amendment Clash in MN или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку Special Report #4 - Federal Power v. State Rights: MN Takes on ICE -The 10th Amendment Clash in MN бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео Special Report #4 - Federal Power v. State Rights: MN Takes on ICE -The 10th Amendment Clash in MN

In this special deep‑dive episode of The Republic – If You Can Keep It, Rob & Lou unpack one of the most fascinating constitutional clashes unfolding today: Minnesota and Minneapolis suing ICE under the 10th Amendment. What looks like a political headline becomes a powerful lesson in federalism, state sovereignty, and the limits of federal authority — the kind of grounded civic analysis that defines this show.

Rob & Lou break down why Minnesota argues that ICE’s enforcement actions inside the state violate the 10th Amendment and impose financial burdens on local resources. They explore the amendment’s famously brief language, the historical meaning of “reserved powers,” and how Minnesota is using that framework to challenge federal immigration enforcement.

The conversation digs into landmark Supreme Court cases like Printz v. United States and Murphy v. NCAA, which established that the federal government cannot commandeer state resources. Rob & Lou contrast this with Texas v. United States, where a state sued the federal government for not enforcing immigration laws — revealing the contradictions that make modern federalism so complex.

With immigration enforcement rooted in Article I and Article II powers, the federal government’s authority is strong — but Minnesota’s lawsuit raises real constitutional questions worth examining. Rob & Lou bring clarity, context, and a steady constitutional lens to one of the most important state‑versus‑federal disputes in the country.

Case Links:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/...
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/...

Official Broadcast & Social Links (Full List)
🎙️ Podcast Platforms
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9u...
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/3f6...
iHeartRadio: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-th...
Pandora: https://www.pandora.com/podcast/the-r...
Deezer: https://www.deezer.com/us/show/100766...
📺 Video Platforms
YouTube (Main Channel):    / @therepublicifyoucankeepit  
YouTube Podcast Playlist:    • The Republic – If You Can Keep It podcast ...  
📱 Social Media
X (Twitter): https://x.com/TheRepublic4All
Instagram:   / therepublic_ifyoucankeepit  

🌍 International & Educational Disclaimer (Full Version)
This content is created for educational, historical, and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, does not create an attorney‑client relationship, and should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal guidance. The views expressed are for civic education and constitutional analysis and do not represent any government, agency, employer, or institution.
This podcast and its hosts do not advocate for or against any political candidate, campaign, or party. All discussions of public policy, legal cases, historical documents, or government actions are presented for public understanding and academic commentary.
References to statutes, court cases, or public documents are used under Fair Use for commentary, criticism, scholarship, and education. All trademarks, case titles, and government materials belong to their respective owners.
© The Republic – If You Can Keep It. All rights reserved.
All original audio, video, written content, and branding associated with this podcast are the property of The Republic – If You Can Keep It and may not be reproduced, redistributed, or republished without express written permission.
This episode may reference publicly available legal documents, court filings, statutes, historical materials, and government publications. These materials are used under Fair Use for purposes of commentary, criticism, education, scholarship, and public interest reporting. All trademarks, case titles, and referenced works belong to their respective owners. No affiliation or endorsement is implied.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]