Скачать или смотреть How to Register Autofac Module with Configuration in .NET Core

Learn how to effectively register your Autofac modules with configuration in .NET Core applications while ensuring access to appsettings in lower-level libraries.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64293875/ asked by the user 'JcMey3r' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2720574/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64302190/ provided by the user 'qujck' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1515209/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How do I Register Autofac Module with Configuration

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Register Autofac Module with Configuration in .NET Core

In today's guide, we will tackle a common issue developers face when trying to register Autofac modules in .NET Core applications, particularly when dealing with a layered architecture. If you've been wondering how to make your IConfiguration accessible from lower-level libraries without cluttering your main application, this guide is for you!

Understanding the Problem

Imagine you have a console application that references several class libraries. You want to use Autofac for dependency injection (DI) but need to ensure that your configuration settings (like those in appsettings.json) are readily available throughout your various modules. Your goal is to create a standalone NuGet package, allowing flexibility in usage without having to dive deep into the configuration details.

The Setup

In our scenario, we have:

A console application that initiates the configuration.

A SendNotificationModule in the Notifications.Send library that should register itself and the lower-level QueueModule from the Notifications.Queue library.

The QueueModule, where you ultimately want access to the configuration settings.

The Solution: Passing the Configuration

The magic happens if we pass our configuration settings through the constructors of these modules. This approach ensures that each module has direct access to what's necessary without duplicating the configuration process or increasing complexity.

Step-by-Step Implementation

Let's break it down step by step.

Step 1: Modify the Console Application

Here's how you can set up your console application to pass the configuration:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Update the SendNotificationModule

Next, adjust the SendNotificationModule to accept the configuration:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Implement the QueueModule

Finally, modify the QueueModule to accept the configuration:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By following the steps above, you successfully allow your lower-level libraries to access configuration settings without losing the modularity of your application. This method maintains clean code and ensures that your design is both efficient and scalable.

Whether you're working on a small project or building a more extensive, reusable library, applying these techniques can significantly enhance your workflow and maintainability.

Happy coding!