Скачать или смотреть Observational vs Historical Science

Natural History Museums create the impression that scientists from every field unanimously support the idea that evolution over millions of years explains all life on earth. But is this idea based on real, testable science? the same type of scientific method used today for putting people on the moon and advancing medical breakthroughs? We can't go back into the distant past to test evolution theory and the evidence for a recent creation and global flood is much stronger. Historical science requires inference and guesswork and observational science requires observation, testing, and repetition, which cannot be done on evolution. See here for more: www.genesisimpact.com