Dad's Paying $2,350 Monthly Spousal Support, while Mom Has Re-Married and Is Employed

The court is addressing a dispute between Angel Bond and Mark Bond regarding parenting time with their daughter. The court clarifies the judgment of divorce and establishes specific weekends for parenting time. Mark Bond claims their daughter has chosen to spend full-time with him, but the court advises him to file a motion to modify custody. The court also suggests reunification counseling for the family to address the issues between Angel Bond and their daughter. Mark Bond agrees to participate in counseling, and the court orders both parties to share the cost of counseling. Angel Bond expresses financial concerns, and the court suggests seeking assistance from a means-tested program to cover the costs of counseling.

The court is dealing with several cases involving child custody, support, and parenting time arrangements. In one case, Miss Mcneff is representing a plaintiff seeking to modify child support due to a change in income. The defendant argues that the plaintiff still has issues with alcohol and anger management. The court suggests supervised visitation with guardrails to ensure the child's safety. In another case, Miss Reiser is representing a plaintiff seeking a temporary parenting time arrangement for their child. The defendant opposes week-on-week parenting time, suggesting every other weekend instead. The court orders standard alternating weekends and midweek parenting time, with a review at the end of the summer.

The court is hearing a case between Dana Allen and Michael Noble regarding the paternity of a child born out of wedlock. Genetic testing is ordered to determine the biological father, with Dakota Torres being named as a possible father. Allen explains that Noble was incarcerated when she got pregnant and that Torres is more likely the father. The court is holding a settlement conference for a custody dispute between Miss Tidwell and Mr. Nichols. They both agree on parenting time, with Mr. Nichols having alternating weeks with their child starting this Friday. They are also instructed to disclose their income for child support calculations. In another case, Miss Smith appears on behalf of the plaintiff, seeking temporary spousal support from Mr. Akudo, who is not present. The court advises Miss Smith to amend her complaint to include the parties' needs and budget before proceeding further.

The defendant is requesting to terminate his spousal support obligation in a divorce case where a judgment was entered on May 23rd, 2016. The defendant was defaulted on January 26th, 2016, after being married to the plaintiff for 13 years. The defendant had been paying $2,350 per month in spousal support for approximately 8 years out of the 13-year marriage. The Uniform Spousal Support Order did not specify a termination date for the support. The plaintiff is believed to have remarried and be employed, but her current income is unknown. The defendant is also paying child support to the plaintiff. Due to the circumstances, the defendant is requesting that both the spousal support obligation and any arrears be terminated.The Court notes that spousal support can be modified under MCL 552.28 and the Tomlinson v. Tomlinson case. The burden is on the defendant to prove a change in circumstances, leading to an evidentiary hearing to determine the matter.

The court proceedings involve a case where Miss Mckediak has filed a motion against Mr. Mckediak for alleged threatening behavior. Miss Mckediak provided dates and details of phone calls where Mr. Mckediak threatened her, including calling her a clown and making threats of violence. Mr. Mckediak denied making any of the alleged phone calls and stated that he was not in Florida during the dates mentioned. He also mentioned having records to prove his whereabouts. The court decided to adjourn the proceedings to allow Miss Hoffman to submit her evidence in paper form for review. Miss Mckediak declined to receive the evidence electronically.Child support is money paid by one parent to the other parent for the purpose of providing financial support to a child or children. Most frequently, child support is paid by the non-custodial parent to the custodial parent, but this is not always the case. Depending on where you live and the agreement you reach, the child support you pay or receive and what expenses it should cover will vary.

@courtwatchers
#court
#comedyvideo
#trending
#comedy
#viralshorts
#childsupport
#video
#viral
​#familylaw #familycourt #court #livecourt #law #court #storytime #lawandcrime #childsupport #zoomcourt #courtcam #familycourt #courtdrama #crime #childbenefit #news #childmaintenance #zoomcourt
#judgesimpson #courtroomdrama #courtdrama