Скачать или смотреть The Best Way to Create a using Declaration for Incomplete Types in C+ +

Learn how to elegantly handle `using` declarations involving members of incomplete types in C+ + . This guide explores practical solutions in C+ + 14 and beyond.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72579840/ asked by the user 'Chuu' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/459975/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72581405/ provided by the user 'user17732522' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17732522/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: What is the best way to create a 'using' declaration involving members of incomplete types?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding using Declarations with Incomplete Types in C+ +

In C+ + , when working with template classes, a common hurdle developers encounter relates to using declarations, particularly when they involve members of incomplete types. This article explores a specific scenario where you aim to create a using declaration within a CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern) class that references members of a base class. We will break down the problem and provide practical solutions to avoid complications inherent in incomplete types.

The Problem

Let's consider a simple implementation of CRTP that includes a vector in a base class and a private member function to access it. The challenge arises when you want to declare a type using the using keyword that depends on a method returning this vector. The issue is that this declaration often leads to complications, as the compiler might not be able to compile it due to incomplete type definitions.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In the code above, attempting to resolve vtype leads to complications because the CRTPType is instantiated before the definition of the concrete base class, which can create an incomplete type.

Solutions to the Problem

Fortunately, there are several solutions to this issue. Let’s explore them one by one.

1. Use a Nested Class

One effective approach is to define the using declaration inside a nested struct within the CRTPType. This approach sidesteps the issue of implicit instantiation by ensuring that the nested struct is only instantiated when necessary.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Use a Template using Declaration

Another way to define the type is to create a templated using declaration within the class itself. This also avoids the implicit instantiation issue, as the template will only be instantiated when it’s needed.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using U = T ensures that this template won’t lead to issues before being fully defined.

3. Move the using Declaration Outside the Class

If you prefer keeping your code tidy and avoiding potential complications, you can move the using declaration outside the class. This method clearly establishes that it doesn’t belong to the class itself.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Important Considerations

Regardless of the method chosen, keep the following in mind:

You must ensure that you do not indirectly invoke vtype or _v() during the instantiation of CRTPType<BaseType> or in BaseType itself; otherwise, you may face the same initial problem.

Remember to declare friend class CRTPType<BaseType> inside BaseType or to mark getV() as public, so it’s accessible.

Conclusion

Handling incomplete types and using declarations within C+ + can be challenging, but with these strategies, you can maintain clean code while sidestepping common pitfalls. By using a nested class, templating the using declaration, or moving it outside the class, you can maintain encapsulation and ensure your code compiles without taking unnecessary risks with type definitions.

Enhance your C+ + coding skills by understanding these nuances, and enjoy developing cleaner and more robust template-based applications!