Скачать или смотреть Understanding Random Slow Queries in PostgreSQL: A Solution

Explore why PostgreSQL queries can have random slow execution times and learn how to tackle this issue effectively with temporary tables.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65882232/ asked by the user 'Ali Hussain' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9060096/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65883395/ provided by the user 'Ali Hussain' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9060096/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Random slow queries in postgresql

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Tackling Random Slow Queries in PostgreSQL

Database performance issues can be particularly frustrating, especially when query execution times fluctuate unexpectedly. In this post, we will explore a case involving PostgreSQL where queries that normally execute in a second occasionally take up to 20 seconds. We will dive into understanding this behavior and how it can be mitigated.

The Problem: Inconsistent Query Performance

Imagine you’ve developed a function in PostgreSQL that should have near-instantaneous performance. Initially, it executes correctly in about one second. However, at unpredictable intervals, its execution time swells to a staggering 20 seconds, before returning to normal. Here’s a quick summary of the situation:

Baseline execution time: 1 second

Random spikes in execution time: Up to 20 seconds

Technical Context: This involved queries with complex joins, especially a left join lateral.

This inconsistency can be attributed to several factors, but often comes down to how PostgreSQL handles join conditions under specific circumstances.

The Technical Insight: Query Plan and Performance Analysis

To understand why the query performance may vary, we must analyze the query plan generated by PostgreSQL. A key component of the given plan is the left join lateral, which can become a performance bottleneck. The planner estimates different execution paths based on cost, and sometimes the estimated costs do not align with the actual execution performance.

Key Observations from the Query Plan

Costly Left Join Lateral: The left join lateral being used can lead to higher costs in specific situations, particularly when there is a large dataset involved, or when the join condition is not optimal.

Query Plan Analysis: The query plan provided detailed information on each step of the query execution. Notably, it highlighted time taken for sorting, hash joins, and nested loops, all of which can vary depending on data distribution and indexing.

Random Spikes: The query may sometimes try to handle large numbers of rows improperly due to how it handles the data relationships, leading to slower execution times.

The Solution: Utilizing Temporary Tables

A promising solution to the performance problem previously experienced with the left join lateral is to leverage temporary tables. Here’s a step-by-step explanation of how this solution can help:

Why Use Temporary Tables?

Storage Optimization: By storing intermediate results in temporary tables, you can facilitate faster access and processing for subsequent queries.

Reduced Complexity in Joins: This reduces the complexity of the join conditions, making it easier for PostgreSQL to optimize the queries.

Isolation of Data: Temporary tables help in managing scope and lifecycle of the data being used within the function.

Implementation Steps

Create a Temporary Table: Before executing the main query, create a temporary table to store the results relevant to the function.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Adjust the Main Query: Modify the main query to use this temporary table instead of performing the left join lateral directly.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Execution: Run the refined query. This can lead to more stable and faster execution times, considerably decreasing the chances of the query suffering from the random slowdowns that were previously observed.

Conclusion

In summary, inconsistent query performance in PostgreSQL can often stem from complex joins, particularly left join laterals. By rethinking the approach through the use of temporary tables, we can effectively curb these sudden spikes in execution time. It is recommended to routinely analyze your query and adjust accordingly to maintain perfo