Скачать или смотреть How to mock a function with optional arguments in Python's unittest module

Learn how to properly mock a function with optional arguments in Python's unittest framework, avoiding common pitfalls.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64771373/ asked by the user 'cyau' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10785101/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64773744/ provided by the user 'MrBean Bremen' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12480730/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Python unittest mock a function with optional default argument that may not be supplied

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Mocking Functions with Optional Arguments in Python's Unittest

When working with Python's unittest framework, developers often need to replace functions with mock objects to test their code more effectively. One common challenge arises when trying to mock a function that includes optional default arguments. This post will explore how to conditionally handle such cases using the unittest.mock library.

The Challenge: Mocking a Function

Consider a simple function defined as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You may want to mock this function during your unit tests. However, the default argument (overwrite) creates a challenge when using unittest.mock.Mock. For example, if you attempted to create a mock like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You would encounter an error:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error occurs because the side_effect you defined does not accept the same signature as the original function, specifically lacking the default argument for overwrite.

The Solution: Adapting the Side Effect

The key to resolving this issue is to ensure that the side_effect of your mock function mimics the original function's signature, including default values for its parameters. Here’s how to implement this correctly:

Step-by-Step Implementation

Define the Side Effect: Update the side_effect to include a default argument in its definition:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Testing the Mock: You can now call the mock function without any arguments and with arguments:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why This Works

By defining the side_effect with overwrite=False, you ensure that your mock behaves just like the real function, allowing you to handle cases where the argument might not be provided. This adaptability maintains compatibility with the function's original design while allowing for mock functionality in your tests.

Conclusion

Mocking functions with optional arguments in Python's unittest framework can seem tricky at first. However, by ensuring your mock's side_effect mirrors the original function's signature—including default values—you can effectively avoid common errors. This strategy not only simplifies your tests but also preserves the expected behavior of your code, leading to more robust testing practices.

Happy testing with Python!