Скачать или смотреть Dynamically Selecting Properties for Equivalency Tests with FluentAssertions

Discover how to create flexible unit tests in C# using `FluentAssertions` to compare object properties dynamically with LINQ expressions.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72013496/ asked by the user 'martijn' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1829773/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72014707/ provided by the user 'Guru Stron' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2501279/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How can I dynamically select properties for equivalency test - FluentAssertions

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introducing Dynamic Property Selection in Unit Tests with FluentAssertions

Creating unit tests that can efficiently manage comparisons between lists of objects can often be a daunting task, especially when dealing with a variety of properties across different object types. When using FluentAssertions in combination with SpecFlow and NUnit for your tests, you might find yourself constrained by static property comparisons.

In this guide, we will delve into how you can dynamically select properties for equivalency tests in C# using FluentAssertions, making your tests more flexible and adaptable to changes.

The Problem Statement

Imagine you are tasked with comparing two lists of objects. These lists are retrieved possibly from a mocked database or SpecFlow tables. Your current method may involve a static property comparison which can lead to issues in maintainability when there are changes to property structures or when you wish to test different scenarios.

Here is a simplified example of what you might currently have:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While this method works, it's quite rigid. You want to change this so that you can decide which properties to compare at runtime, particularly useful when you are working with a large number of object types.

The Solution: Dynamic Property Selection

To achieve this, we can utilize generics and LINQ expressions, allowing you to specify which properties to compare at compile-time. Here’s how:

Step 1: Create a Generic Method

Start by creating a generic method that will accept expected and found lists along with a collection of properties to compare.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Build the Property Expressions

For comparing the lists dynamically, we will create expressions that will be passed to FluentAssertions. We can leverage the Including method overload, which accepts an Expression<Func<IMemberInfo, bool>>.

Here’s how you could set this up:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Putting It All Together

Now your complete method might look like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of This Approach

Flexibility: You can modify which properties are compared without changing the actual test logic.

Maintainability: Reduces the need to update your tests whenever there are changes in object properties.

Reusability: A single, generic comparison method can be used for different object types across various tests.

Conclusion

By using generics and the power of LINQ, you can create dynamic unit tests that modify which properties are compared based on the context required. This approach not only enhances the test coverage but also vastly improves the maintainability of your test suite as you adjust to evolving application requirements.

Feel free to adapt the provided solution to fit your specific needs, and happy testing!