Corporal William "Bill" Harwell, 2nd Battalion, King's Royal Rifle Corps, North Africa, 1942. Age 34, older than most riflemen. Grew up in rural Yorkshire, learned shooting from his father, a gamekeeper on an estate where precision mattered more than volume. Twelve years shooting red deer at 300-400 yards before the war. When the British Army began issuing semi-automatic rifles to frontline units in early 1942, Harwell refused to turn in his Lee-Enfield No. 4 Mk I. His company commander called him stubborn. His platoon mates called him obsolete. The Lee-Enfield fired 10 rounds before reloading. The new semi-automatics fired 20 and didn't require working a bolt between shots. In modern warfare, volume of fire won battles. Everyone knew that. Everyone except Harwell.
By March 1942, British forces in North Africa faced a tactical crisis. German Afrika Korps officers coordinated attacks with devastating effectiveness. Small unit actions succeeded because German lieutenants and captains positioned themselves at optimal vantage points 400-600 yards behind their advancing troops, directing fire through hand signals and runners. British doctrine emphasized suppressive fire at 200-300 yards. At that range, semi-automatic rifles excelled. But German officers stayed beyond effective semi-automatic range, safely orchestrating attacks while British troops took casualties. In February 1942 alone, the 2nd Battalion suffered 127 casualties during German advances. Intelligence reports consistently noted excellent German tactical coordination. British units couldn't disrupt German command and control. They couldn't reach the officers directing the attacks.
Harwell observed that while his platoon blazed away with semi-automatics at 200 yards, German officers stood calmly at 500 yards with binoculars, entirely safe. The semi-automatic rifles weren't accurate enough at that distance. Too much recoil, too much barrel movement, insufficient precision. But the Lee-Enfield, fired from prone position with proper breathing technique, could hit man-sized targets at 500 yards consistently. Harwell had done it hundreds of times shooting deer. One day in late March 1942, during a German advance near Gazala, Harwell ignored the advancing infantry and aimed at a German officer standing on a ridge 480 yards away. He fired once. The officer dropped. The German advance immediately lost coordination. Infantry units hesitated without direction. British forces repelled the attack. Harwell's company commander noticed. Other riflemen noticed. And the question became: what if precision mattered more than volume?
This premise sets up a story about tactical innovation through weapon application rather than weapon modification. The Lee-Enfield wasn't broken—British doctrine was. Harwell's technique would prove that eliminating German officers at extended range disrupted enemy operations more effectively than suppressing German infantry at close range. The story would track how Harwell trained other riflemen in precision shooting, how German forces adapted by keeping officers farther back or using more cover, how British command eventually authorized dedicated "officer hunting" teams, and how one corporal with an "obsolete" bolt-action rifle changed how the British Army approached counter-leadership targeting.
Between April and August 1942, Harwell personally eliminated 23 confirmed German officers. Units employing his technique showed 34% reduction in casualties during German attacks. The innovation spread throughout North Africa, then Italy, then Northwest Europe. But Harwell never received official recognition because targeting officers was considered "ungentlemanly warfare" by some senior British commanders. He survived the war, returned to Yorkshire, worked as a gamekeeper until 1973, and died in 1989 having never told his grandchildren what he did in North Africa.
Информация по комментариям в разработке