Indoor positioning technologies review

https://marvelmind.com/pics/marvelmin...

Review and comparison of different indoor positioning technologies and methods with focus on industrial applications.


Transcript:
[0:00] Indoor navigation & positioning
[0:59] Problem to solve
[1:37] Terminology
[1:48] Types of indoor positioning methods
[8:23] No methods or RTLS good for all
[10:59] RSSI-based RTLS imprecise by design
[17:20] IMU-based RTLS drifts a lot
[22:28] Trilateration can be very precise
[26:48] Precise RTLS must have line of sight
[35:14] What to do in Non-LOS situations?
[41:24] Different flavors of UWB
[43:45] LIDARs: precise, but not really designed for positioning and navigation
[45:46] QR codes + IMU + odometry
[47:24] Visual positioning
[52:53] Requirements: Location update rate
[56:12] Requirements: Power supply & battery lifetime
[1:01:04] Location vs. Location + Direction
[1:03:10] Market approach by Marvelmind Robotics
[1:05:17] Marvelmind Indoor “GPS”
[1:06:15] Indoor “GPS” (±2cm)
[1:06:27] Selected customers
[1:06:35] Autonomous robots, drones, VR
[1:06:45] Use cases: mobile assets tracking
[1:07:34] Use cases: safety & productivity
[1:08:41] Non-Inverse Architecture (NIA)
[1:15:03] Inverse Architecture (IA)
[1:18:12] Huge AGV, transport and people
[1:19:57] Safety at the construction site, people
[1:21:35] Safety when working cranes and people
[1:22:22] Tracking service staff
[1:23:58] Tunnel safety and performance
[1:27:25] Beacons comparison
[1:29:01] Summary
[1:30:02] Thank you!